Archive for category Bash Scripting
Getting Started with Data Analysis on AWS using AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and QuickSight: Part 1
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in AWS, Bash Scripting, Big Data, Cloud, Python, Serverless, Software Development on January 5, 2020
Introduction
According to Wikipedia, data analysis is “a process of inspecting, cleansing, transforming, and modeling data with the goal of discovering useful information, informing conclusion, and supporting decision-making.” In this two-part post, we will explore how to get started with data analysis on AWS, using the serverless capabilities of Amazon Athena, AWS Glue, Amazon QuickSight, Amazon S3, and AWS Lambda. We will learn how to use these complementary services to transform, enrich, analyze, and visualize semi-structured data.
Data Analysis—discovering useful information, informing conclusion, and supporting decision-making. –Wikipedia
In part one, we will begin with raw, semi-structured data in multiple formats. We will discover how to ingest, transform, and enrich that data using Amazon S3, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and AWS Lambda. We will build an S3-based data lake, and learn how AWS leverages open-source technologies, such as Presto, Apache Hive, and Apache Parquet. In part two, we will learn how to further analyze and visualize the data using Amazon QuickSight. Here’s a quick preview of what we will build in part one of the post.
Demonstration
In this demonstration, we will adopt the persona of a large, US-based electric energy provider. The energy provider has developed its next-generation Smart Electrical Monitoring Hub (Smart Hub). They have sold the Smart Hub to a large number of residential customers throughout the United States. The hypothetical Smart Hub wirelessly collects detailed electrical usage data from individual, smart electrical receptacles and electrical circuit meters, spread throughout the residence. Electrical usage data is encrypted and securely transmitted from the customer’s Smart Hub to the electric provider, who is running their business on AWS.
Customers are able to analyze their electrical usage with fine granularity, per device, and over time. The goal of the Smart Hub is to enable the customers, using data, to reduce their electrical costs. The provider benefits from a reduction in load on the existing electrical grid and a better distribution of daily electrical load as customers shift usage to off-peak times to save money.
Preview of post’s data in Amazon QuickSight.
The original concept for the Smart Hub was developed as part of a multi-day training and hackathon, I recently attended with an AWSome group of AWS Solutions Architects in San Francisco. As a team, we developed the concept of the Smart Hub integrated with a real-time, serverless, streaming data architecture, leveraging AWS IoT Core, Amazon Kinesis, AWS Lambda, and Amazon DynamoDB.
From left: Bruno Giorgini, Mahalingam (‘Mahali’) Sivaprakasam, Gary Stafford, Amit Kumar Agrawal, and Manish Agarwal.
This post will focus on data analysis, as opposed to the real-time streaming aspect of data capture or how the data is persisted on AWS.
High-level AWS architecture diagram of the demonstration.
Featured Technologies
The following AWS services and open-source technologies are featured prominently in this post.
Amazon S3-based Data Lake
An Amazon S3-based Data Lake uses Amazon S3 as its primary storage platform. Amazon S3 provides an optimal foundation for a data lake because of its virtually unlimited scalability, from gigabytes to petabytes of content. Amazon S3 provides ‘11 nines’ (99.999999999%) durability. It has scalable performance, ease-of-use features, and native encryption and access control capabilities.
AWS Glue
AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service to prepare and load data for analytics. AWS Glue discovers your data and stores the associated metadata (e.g., table definition and schema) in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. Once cataloged, your data is immediately searchable, queryable, and available for ETL.
AWS Glue Data Catalog
The AWS Glue Data Catalog is an Apache Hive Metastore compatible, central repository to store structural and operational metadata for data assets. For a given data set, store table definition, physical location, add business-relevant attributes, as well as track how the data has changed over time.
AWS Glue Crawler
An AWS Glue Crawler connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to extract the schema of your data and other statistics, and then populates the Glue Data Catalog with this metadata. Crawlers can run periodically to detect the availability of new data as well as changes to existing data, including table definition changes. Crawlers automatically add new tables, new partitions to an existing table, and new versions of table definitions. You can even customize Glue Crawlers to classify your own file types.
AWS Glue ETL Job
An AWS Glue ETL Job is the business logic that performs extract, transform, and load (ETL) work in AWS Glue. When you start a job, AWS Glue runs a script that extracts data from sources, transforms the data, and loads it into targets. AWS Glue generates a PySpark or Scala script, which runs on Apache Spark.
Amazon Athena
Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports and works with a variety of standard data formats, including CSV, JSON, Apache ORC, Apache Avro, and Apache Parquet. Athena is integrated, out-of-the-box, with AWS Glue Data Catalog. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.
The underlying technology behind Amazon Athena is Presto, the open-source distributed SQL query engine for big data, created by Facebook. According to the AWS, the Athena query engine is based on Presto 0.172 (released April 9, 2017). In addition to Presto, Athena uses Apache Hive to define tables.
Amazon QuickSight
Amazon QuickSight is a fully managed business intelligence (BI) service. QuickSight lets you create and publish interactive dashboards that can then be accessed from any device, and embedded into your applications, portals, and websites.
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda automatically runs code without requiring the provisioning or management servers. AWS Lambda automatically scales applications by running code in response to triggers. Lambda code runs in parallel. With AWS Lambda, you are charged for every 100ms your code executes and the number of times your code is triggered. You pay only for the compute time you consume.
Smart Hub Data
Everything in this post revolves around data. For the post’s demonstration, we will start with four categories of raw, synthetic data. Those data categories include Smart Hub electrical usage data, Smart Hub sensor mapping data, Smart Hub residential locations data, and electrical rate data. To demonstrate the capabilities of AWS Glue to handle multiple data formats, the four categories of raw data consist of three distinct file formats: XML, JSON, and CSV. I have attempted to incorporate as many ‘real-world’ complexities into the data without losing focus on the main subject of the post. The sample datasets are intentionally small to keep your AWS costs to a minimum for the demonstration.
To further reduce costs, we will use a variety of data partitioning schemes. According to AWS, by partitioning your data, you can restrict the amount of data scanned by each query, thus improving performance and reducing cost. We have very little data for the demonstration, in which case partitioning may negatively impact query performance. However, in a ‘real-world’ scenario, there would be millions of potential residential customers generating terabytes of data. In that case, data partitioning would be essential for both cost and performance.
Smart Hub Electrical Usage Data
The Smart Hub’s time-series electrical usage data is collected from the customer’s Smart Hub. In the demonstration’s sample electrical usage data, each row represents a completely arbitrary five-minute time interval. There are a total of ten electrical sensors whose electrical usage in kilowatt-hours (kW) is recorded and transmitted. Each Smart Hub records and transmits electrical usage for 10 device sensors, 288 times per day (24 hr / 5 min intervals), for a total of 2,880 data points per day, per Smart Hub. There are two days worth of usage data for the demonstration, for a total of 5,760 data points. The data is stored in JSON Lines format. The usage data will be partitioned in the Amazon S3-based data lake by date (e.g., ‘dt=2019-12-21’).
Note the electrical usage data contains nested data. The electrical usage for each of the ten sensors is contained in a JSON array, within each time series entry. The array contains ten numeric values of type, double.
Real data is often complex and deeply nested. Later in the post, we will see that AWS Glue can map many common data types, including nested data objects, as illustrated below.
Smart Hub Sensor Mappings
The Smart Hub sensor mappings data maps a sensor column in the usage data (e.g., ‘s_01’ to the corresponding actual device (e.g., ‘Central Air Conditioner’). The data contains the device location, wattage, and the last time the record was modified. The data is also stored in JSON Lines format. The sensor mappings data will be partitioned in the Amazon S3-based data lake by the state of the residence (e.g., ‘state=or’ for Oregon).
Smart Hub Locations
The Smart Hub locations data contains the geospatial coordinates, home address, and timezone for each residential Smart Hub. The data is stored in CSV format. The data for the four cities included in this demonstration originated from OpenAddresses, ‘the free and open global address collection.’ There are approximately 4k location records. The location data will be partitioned in the Amazon S3-based data lake by the state of the residence where the Smart Hub is installed (e.g., ‘state=or’ for Oregon).
Electrical Rates
Lastly, the electrical rate data contains the cost of electricity. In this demonstration, the assumption is that the rate varies by state, by month, and by the hour of the day. The data is stored in XML, a data export format still common to older, legacy systems. The electrical rate data will not be partitioned in the Amazon S3-based data lake.
Data Analysis Process
Due to the number of steps involved in the data analysis process in the demonstration, I have divided the process into four logical stages: 1) Raw Data Ingestion, 2) Data Transformation, 3) Data Enrichment, and 4) Data Visualization and Business Intelligence (BI).
Full data analysis workflow diagram (click to enlarge…)
Raw Data Ingestion
In the Raw Data Ingestion stage, semi-structured CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format data files are copied to a secure Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) bucket. Within the bucket, data files are organized into folders based on their physical data structure (schema). Due to the potentially unlimited number of data files, files are further organized (partitioned) into subfolders. Organizational strategies for data files are based on date, time, geographic location, customer id, or other common data characteristics.
This collection of semi-structured data files, S3 buckets, and partitions form what is referred to as a Data Lake. According to AWS, a data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale.
A series of AWS Glue Crawlers process the raw CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format files, extracting metadata, and creating table definitions in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. According to AWS, an AWS Glue Data Catalog contains metadata tables, where each table specifies a single data store.
Data Transformation
In the Data Transformation stage, the raw data in the previous stage is transformed. Data transformation may include both modifying the data and changing the data format. Data modifications include data cleansing, re-casting data types, changing date formats, field-level computations, and field concatenation.
The data is then converted from CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format to Apache Parquet format and written back to the Amazon S3-based data lake. Apache Parquet is a compressed, efficient columnar storage format. Amazon Athena, like many Cloud-based services, charges you by the amount of data scanned per query. Hence, using data partitioning, bucketing, compression, and columnar storage formats, like Parquet, will reduce query cost.
Lastly, the transformed Parquet-format data is cataloged to new tables, alongside the raw CSV, XML, and JSON data, in the Glue Data Catalog.
Data Enrichment
According to ScienceDirect, data enrichment or augmentation is the process of enhancing existing information by supplementing missing or incomplete data. Typically, data enrichment is achieved by using external data sources, but that is not always the case.
Data Enrichment—the process of enhancing existing information by supplementing missing or incomplete data. –ScienceDirect
In the Data Enrichment stage, the Parquet-format Smart Hub usage data is augmented with related data from the three other data sources: sensor mappings, locations, and electrical rates. The customer’s Smart Hub usage data is enriched with the customer’s device types, the customer’s timezone, and customer’s electricity cost per monitored period based on the customer’s geographic location and time of day.
Once the data is enriched, it is converted to Parquet and optimized for query performance, stored in the data lake, and cataloged. At this point, the original CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format raw data files, the transformed Parquet-format data files, and the Parquet-format enriched data files are all stored in the Amazon S3-based data lake and cataloged in the Glue Data Catalog.
Data Visualization
In the final Data Visualization and Business Intelligence (BI) stage, the enriched data is presented and analyzed. There are many enterprise-grade services available for visualization and Business Intelligence, which integrate with Athena. Amazon services include Amazon QuickSight, Amazon EMR, and Amazon SageMaker. Third-party solutions from AWS Partners, available on the AWS Marketplace, include Tableau, Looker, Sisense, and Domo. In this demonstration, we will focus on Amazon QuickSight.
Getting Started
Requirements
To follow along with the demonstration, you will need an AWS Account and a current version of the AWS CLI. To get the most from the demonstration, you should also have Python 3 and jq installed in your work environment.
Source Code
All source code for this post can be found on GitHub. Use the following command to clone a copy of the project.
Source code samples in this post are displayed as GitHub Gists, which will not display correctly on some mobile and social media browsers.
TL;DR?
Just want the jump in without reading the instructions? All the AWS CLI commands, found within the post, are consolidated in the GitHub project’s README file.
CloudFormation Stack
To start, create the ‘smart-hub-athena-glue-stack’ CloudFormation stack using the smart-hub-athena-glue.yml template. The template will create (3) Amazon S3 buckets, (1) AWS Glue Data Catalog Database, (5) Data Catalog Database Tables, (6) AWS Glue Crawlers, (1) AWS Glue ETL Job, and (1) IAM Service Role for AWS Glue.
Make sure to change the DATA_BUCKET, SCRIPT_BUCKET, and LOG_BUCKET variables, first, to your own unique S3 bucket names. I always suggest using the standard AWS 3-part convention of 1) descriptive name, 2) AWS Account ID or Account Alias, and 3) AWS Region, to name your bucket (e.g. ‘smart-hub-data-123456789012-us-east-1’).
Raw Data Files
Next, copy the raw CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format data files from the local project to the DATA_BUCKET S3 bucket (steps 1a-1b in workflow diagram). These files represent the beginnings of the S3-based data lake. Each category of data uses a different strategy for organizing and separating the files. Note the use of the Apache Hive-style partitions (e.g., /smart_hub_data_json/dt=2019-12-21). As discussed earlier, the assumption is that the actual, large volume of data in the data lake would necessitate using partitioning to improve query performance.
Confirm the contents of the DATA_BUCKET S3 bucket with the following command.
There should be a total of (14) raw data files in the DATA_BUCKET S3 bucket.
Lambda Functions
Next, package the (5) Python3.8-based AWS Lambda functions for deployment.
Copy the five Lambda packages to the SCRIPT_BUCKET S3 bucket. The ZIP archive Lambda packages are accessed by the second CloudFormation stack, smart-hub-serverless. This CloudFormation stack, which creates the Lambda functions, will fail to deploy if the packages are not found in the SCRIPT_BUCKET S3 bucket.
I have chosen to place the packages in a different S3 bucket then the raw data files. In a real production environment, these two types of files would be separated, minimally, into separate buckets for security. Remember, only data should go into the data lake.
Create the second ‘smart-hub-lambda-stack’ CloudFormation stack using the smart-hub-lambda.yml CloudFormation template. The template will create (5) AWS Lambda functions and (1) Lambda execution IAM Service Role.
At this point, we have deployed all of the AWS resources required for the demonstration using CloudFormation. We have also copied all of the raw CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format data files in the Amazon S3-based data lake.
AWS Glue Crawlers
If you recall, we created five tables in the Glue Data Catalog database as part of the CloudFormation stack. One table for each of the four raw data types and one table to hold temporary ELT data later in the demonstration. To confirm the five tables were created in the Glue Data Catalog database, use the Glue Data Catalog Console, or run the following AWS CLI / jq command.
The five data catalog tables should be as follows.
We also created six Glue Crawlers as part of the CloudFormation template. Four of these Crawlers are responsible for cataloging the raw CSV-, XML-, and JSON-format data from S3 into the corresponding, existing Glue Data Catalog database tables. The Crawlers will detect any new partitions and add those to the tables as well. Each Crawler corresponds to one of the four raw data types. Crawlers can be scheduled to run periodically, cataloging new data and updating data partitions. Crawlers will also create a Data Catalog database tables. We use Crawlers to create new tables, later in the post.
Run the four Glue Crawlers using the AWS CLI (step 1c in workflow diagram).
You can check the Glue Crawler Console to ensure the four Crawlers finished successfully.
Alternately, use another AWS CLI / jq command.
When complete, all Crawlers should all be in a state of ‘Still Estimating = false’ and ‘TimeLeftSeconds = 0’. In my experience, the Crawlers can take up one minute to start, after the estimation stage, and one minute to stop when complete.
Successfully running the four Crawlers completes the Raw Data Ingestion stage of the demonstration.
Converting to Parquet with CTAS
With the Raw Data Ingestion stage completed, we will now transform the raw Smart Hub usage data, sensor mapping data, and locations data into Parquet-format using three AWS Lambda functions. Each Lambda subsequently calls Athena, which executes a CREATE TABLE AS SELECT SQL statement (aka CTAS) . Each Lambda executes a similar command, varying only by data source, data destination, and partitioning scheme. Below, is an example of the command used for the Smart Hub electrical usage data, taken from the Python-based Lambda, athena-json-to-parquet-data/index.py.
This compact, yet powerful CTAS statement converts a copy of the raw JSON- and CSV-format data files into Parquet-format, and partitions and stores the resulting files back into the S3-based data lake. Additionally, the CTAS SQL statement catalogs the Parquet-format data files into the Glue Data Catalog database, into new tables. Unfortunately, this method will not work for the XML-format raw data files, which we will tackle next.
The five deployed Lambda functions should be visible from the Lambda Console’s Functions tab.
Invoke the three Lambda functions using the AWS CLI. (part of step 2a in workflow diagram).
Here is an example of the same CTAS command, shown above for the Smart Hub electrical usage data, as it is was executed successfully by Athena.
We can view any Athena SQL query from the Athena Console’s History tab. Clicking on a query (in pink) will copy it to the Query Editor tab and execute it. Below, we see the three SQL statements executed by the Lamba functions.
AWS Glue ETL Job for XML
If you recall, the electrical rate data is in XML format. The Lambda functions we just executed, converted the CSV and JSON data to Parquet using Athena. Currently, unlike CSV, JSON, ORC, Parquet, and Avro, Athena does not support the older XML data format. For the XML data files, we will use an AWS Glue ETL Job to convert the XML data to Parquet. The Glue ETL Job is written in Python and uses Apache Spark, along with several AWS Glue PySpark extensions. For this job, I used an existing script created in the Glue ETL Jobs Console as a base, then modified the script to meet my needs.
The three Python command-line arguments the script expects (lines 10–12, above) are defined in the CloudFormation template, smart-hub-athena-glue.yml. Below, we see them on lines 10–12 of the CloudFormation snippet. They are injected automatically when the job is run and can be overridden from the command line when starting the job.
First, copy the Glue ETL Job Python script to the SCRIPT_BUCKET S3 bucket.
Next, start the Glue ETL Job (part of step 2a in workflow diagram). Although the conversion is a relatively simple set of tasks, the creation of the Apache Spark environment, to execute the tasks, will take several minutes. Whereas the Glue Crawlers took about 2 minutes on average, the Glue ETL Job could take 10–15 minutes in my experience. The actual execution time only takes about 1–2 minutes of the 10–15 minutes to complete. In my opinion, waiting up to 15 minutes is too long to be viable for ad-hoc jobs against smaller datasets; Glue ETL Jobs are definitely targeted for big data.
To check on the status of the job, use the Glue ETL Jobs Console, or use the AWS CLI.
When complete, you should see results similar to the following. Note the ‘JobRunState’ is ‘SUCCEEDED.’ This particular job ran for a total of 14.92 minutes, while the actual execution time was 2.25 minutes.
The job’s progress and the results are also visible in the AWS Glue Console’s ETL Jobs tab.
Detailed Apache Spark logs are also available in CloudWatch Management Console, which is accessible directly from the Logs link in the AWS Glue Console’s ETL Jobs tab.
The last step in the Data Transformation stage is to convert catalog the Parquet-format electrical rates data, created with the previous Glue ETL Job, using yet another Glue Crawler (part of step 2b in workflow diagram). Start the following Glue Crawler to catalog the Parquet-format electrical rates data.
This concludes the Data Transformation stage. The raw and transformed data is in the data lake, and the following nine tables should exist in the Glue Data Catalog.
If we examine the tables, we should observe the data partitions we used to organize the data files in the Amazon S3-based data lake are contained in the table metadata. Below, we see the four partitions, based on state, of the Parquet-format locations data.
Data Enrichment
To begin the Data Enrichment stage, we will invoke the AWS Lambda, athena-complex-etl-query/index.py. This Lambda accepts input parameters (lines 28–30, below), passed in the Lambda handler’s event parameter. The arguments include the Smart Hub ID, the start date for the data requested, and the end date for the data requested. The scenario for the demonstration is that a customer with the location id value, using the electrical provider’s application, has requested data for a particular range of days (start date and end date), to visualize and analyze.
The Lambda executes a series of Athena INSERT INTO SQL statements, one statement for each of the possible Smart Hub connected electrical sensors, s_01 through s_10, for which there are values in the Smart Hub electrical usage data. Amazon just released the Amazon Athena INSERT INTO a table using the results of a SELECT query capability in September 2019, an essential addition to Athena. New Athena features are listed in the release notes.
Here, the SELECT query is actually a series of chained subqueries, using Presto SQL’s WITH clause capability. The queries join the Parquet-format Smart Hub electrical usage data sources in the S3-based data lake, with the other three Parquet-format, S3-based data sources: sensor mappings, locations, and electrical rates. The Parquet-format data is written as individual files to S3 and inserted into the existing ‘etl_tmp_output_parquet’ Glue Data Catalog database table. Compared to traditional relational database-based queries, the capabilities of Glue and Athena to enable complex SQL queries across multiple semi-structured data files, stored in S3, is truly amazing!
The capabilities of Glue and Athena to enable complex SQL queries across multiple semi-structured data files, stored in S3, is truly amazing!
Below, we see the SQL statement starting on line 43.
Below, is an example of one of the final queries, for the s_10 sensor, as executed by Athena. All the input parameter values, Python variables, and environment variables have been resolved into the query.
Along with enriching the data, the query performs additional data transformation using the other data sources. For example, the Unix timestamp is converted to a localized timestamp containing the date and time, according to the customer’s location (line 7, above). Transforming dates and times is a frequent, often painful, data analysis task. Another example of data enrichment is the augmentation of the data with a new, computed column. The column’s values are calculated using the values of two other columns (line 33, above).
Invoke the Lambda with the following three parameters in the payload (step 3a in workflow diagram).
The ten INSERT INTO SQL statement’s result statuses (one per device sensor) are visible from the Athena Console’s History tab.
Each Athena query execution saves that query’s results to the S3-based data lake as individual, uncompressed Parquet-format data files. The data is partitioned in the Amazon S3-based data lake by the Smart Meter location ID (e.g., ‘loc_id=b6a8d42425fde548’).
Below is a snippet of the enriched data for a customer’s clothes washer (sensor ‘s_04’). Note the timestamp is now an actual date and time in the local timezone of the customer (e.g., ‘2019-12-21 20:10:00.000’). The sensor ID (‘s_04’) is replaced with the actual device name (‘Clothes Washer’). The location of the device (‘Basement’) and the type of electrical usage period (e.g. ‘peak’ or ‘partial-peak’) has been added. Finally, the cost column has been computed.
To transform the enriched CSV-format data to Parquet-format, we need to catalog the CSV-format results using another Crawler, first (step 3d in workflow diagram).
Optimizing Enriched Data
The previous step created enriched Parquet-format data. However, this data is not as optimized for query efficiency as it should be. Using the Athena INSERT INTO WITH SQL statement, allowed the data to be partitioned. However, the method does not allow the Parquet data to be easily combined into larger files and compressed. To perform both these optimizations, we will use one last Lambda, athena-parquet-to-parquet-elt-data/index.py. The Lambda will create a new location in the Amazon S3-based data lake, containing all the enriched data, in a single file and compressed using Snappy compression.
The resulting Parquet file is visible in the S3 Management Console.
The final step in the Data Enrichment stage is to catalog the optimized Parquet-format enriched ETL data. To catalog the data, run the following Glue Crawler (step 3i in workflow diagram
Final Data Lake and Data Catalog
We should now have the following ten top-level folders of partitioned data in the S3-based data lake. The ‘tmp’ folder may be ignored.
Similarly, we should now have the following ten corresponding tables in the Glue Data Catalog. Use the AWS Glue Console to confirm the tables exist.
Alternately, use the following AWS CLI / jq command to list the table names.
‘Unknown’ Bug
You may have noticed the four tables created with the AWS Lambda functions, using the CTAS SQL statement, erroneously have the ‘Classification’ of ‘Unknown’ as opposed to ‘parquet’. I am not sure why, I believe it is a possible bug with the CTAS feature. It seems to have no adverse impact on the table’s functionality. However, to fix the issue, run the following set of commands. This aws glue update-table hack will switch the table’s ‘Classification’ to ‘parquet’.
The results of the fix may be seen from the AWS Glue Console. All ten tables are now classified correctly.
Explore the Data
Before starting to visualize and analyze the data with Amazon QuickSight, try executing a few Athena queries against the tables in the Glue Data Catalog database, using the Athena Query Editor. Working in the Editor is the best way to understand the data, learn Athena, and debug SQL statements and queries. The Athena Query Editor has convenient developer features like SQL auto-complete and query formatting capabilities.
Be mindful when writing queries and searching the Internet for SQL references, the Athena query engine is based on Presto 0.172. The current version of Presto, 0.229, is more than 50 releases ahead of the current Athena version. Both Athena and Presto functionality has changed and diverged. There are additional considerations and limitations for SQL queries in Athena to be aware of.
Here are a few simple, ad-hoc queries to run in the Athena Query Editor.
Cleaning Up
You may choose to save the AWS resources created in part one of this demonstration, to be used in part two. Since you are not actively running queries against the data, ongoing AWS costs will be minimal. If you eventually choose to clean up the AWS resources created in part one of this demonstration, execute the following AWS CLI commands. To avoid failures, make sure each command completes before running the subsequent command. You will need to confirm the CloudFormation stacks are deleted using the AWS CloudFormation Console or the AWS CLI. These commands will not remove Amazon QuickSight data sets, analyses, and dashboards created in part two. However, deleting the AWS Glue Data Catalog and the underlying data sources will impact the ability to visualize the data in QuickSight.
Part Two
In part one, starting with raw, semi-structured data in multiple formats, we learned how to ingest, transform, and enrich that data using Amazon S3, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and AWS Lambda. We built an S3-based data lake and learned how AWS leverages open-source technologies, including Presto, Apache Hive, and Apache Parquet. In part two of this post, we will use the transformed and enriched datasets, stored in the data lake, to create compelling visualizations using Amazon QuickSight.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
Getting Started with Data Analytics using Jupyter Notebooks, PySpark, and Docker
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in Bash Scripting, Big Data, Build Automation, DevOps, Python, Software Development on December 6, 2019
Introduction
There is little question, big data analytics, data science, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML), a subcategory of AI, have all experienced a tremendous surge in popularity over the last few years. Behind the marketing hype, these technologies are having a significant influence on many aspects of our modern lives. Due to their popularity and potential benefits, commercial enterprises, academic institutions, and the public sector are rushing to develop hardware and software solutions to lower the barriers to entry and increase the velocity of ML and Data Scientists and Engineers.
(courtesy Google Trends and Plotly)
Many open-source software projects are also lowering the barriers to entry into these technologies. An excellent example of one such open-source project working on this challenge is Project Jupyter. Similar to Apache Zeppelin and the newly open-sourced Netflix’s Polynote, Jupyter Notebooks enables data-driven, interactive, and collaborative data analytics.
This post will demonstrate the creation of a containerized data analytics environment using Jupyter Docker Stacks. The particular environment will be suited for learning and developing applications for Apache Spark using the Python, Scala, and R programming languages. We will focus on Python and Spark, using PySpark.
Featured Technologies
The following technologies are featured prominently in this post.
Jupyter Notebooks
According to Project Jupyter, the Jupyter Notebook, formerly known as the IPython Notebook, is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents that contain live code, equations, visualizations, and narrative text. Uses include data cleansing and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, machine learning, and much more. The word, Jupyter, is a loose acronym for Julia, Python, and R, but today, the Jupyter supports many programming languages.
Interest in Jupyter Notebooks has grown dramatically over the last 3–5 years, fueled in part by the major Cloud providers, AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure. Amazon Sagemaker, Amazon EMR (Elastic MapReduce), Google Cloud Dataproc, Google Colab (Collaboratory), and Microsoft Azure Notebooks all have direct integrations with Jupyter notebooks for big data analytics and machine learning.
(courtesy Google Trends and Plotly)
Jupyter Docker Stacks
To enable quick and easy access to Jupyter Notebooks, Project Jupyter has created Jupyter Docker Stacks. The stacks are ready-to-run Docker images containing Jupyter applications, along with accompanying technologies. Currently, the Jupyter Docker Stacks focus on a variety of specializations, including the r-notebook, scipy-notebook, tensorflow-notebook, datascience-notebook, pyspark-notebook, and the subject of this post, the all-spark-notebook. The stacks include a wide variety of well-known packages to extend their functionality, such as scikit-learn, pandas, Matplotlib, Bokeh, NumPy, and Facets.
Apache Spark
According to Apache, Spark is a unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing. Starting as a research project at the UC Berkeley AMPLab in 2009, Spark was open-sourced in early 2010 and moved to the Apache Software Foundation in 2013. Reviewing the postings on any major career site will confirm that Spark is widely used by well-known modern enterprises, such as Netflix, Adobe, Capital One, Lockheed Martin, JetBlue Airways, Visa, and Databricks. At the time of this post, LinkedIn, alone, had approximately 3,500 listings for jobs that reference the use of Apache Spark, just in the United States.
With speeds up to 100 times faster than Hadoop, Apache Spark achieves high performance for static, batch, and streaming data, using a state-of-the-art DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) scheduler, a query optimizer, and a physical execution engine. Spark’s polyglot programming model allows users to write applications quickly in Scala, Java, Python, R, and SQL. Spark includes libraries for Spark SQL (DataFrames and Datasets), MLlib (Machine Learning), GraphX (Graph Processing), and DStreams (Spark Streaming). You can run Spark using its standalone cluster mode, Apache Hadoop YARN, Mesos, or Kubernetes.
PySpark
The Spark Python API, PySpark, exposes the Spark programming model to Python. PySpark is built on top of Spark’s Java API and uses Py4J. According to Apache, Py4J, a bridge between Python and Java, enables Python programs running in a Python interpreter to dynamically access Java objects in a Java Virtual Machine (JVM). Data is processed in Python and cached and shuffled in the JVM.
Docker
According to Docker, their technology gives developers and IT the freedom to build, manage, and secure business-critical applications without the fear of technology or infrastructure lock-in. For this post, I am using the current stable version of Docker Desktop Community version for macOS.
Docker Swarm
Current versions of Docker include both a Kubernetes and Swarm orchestrator for deploying and managing containers. We will choose Swarm for this demonstration. According to Docker, the cluster management and orchestration features embedded in the Docker Engine are built using swarmkit. Swarmkit is a separate project which implements Docker’s orchestration layer and is used directly within Docker.
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is a powerful, open-source, object-relational database system. According to their website, PostgreSQL comes with many features aimed to help developers build applications, administrators to protect data integrity and build fault-tolerant environments, and help manage data no matter how big or small the dataset.
Demonstration
In this demonstration, we will explore the capabilities of the Spark Jupyter Docker Stack to provide an effective data analytics development environment. We will explore a few everyday uses, including executing Python scripts, submitting PySpark jobs, and working with Jupyter Notebooks, and reading and writing data to and from different file formats and a database. We will be using the latest jupyter/all-spark-notebook Docker Image. This image includes Python, R, and Scala support for Apache Spark, using Apache Toree.
Architecture
As shown below, we will deploy a Docker stack to a single-node Docker swarm. The stack consists of a Jupyter All-Spark-Notebook, PostgreSQL (Alpine Linux version 12), and Adminer container. The Docker stack will have two local directories bind-mounted into the containers. Files from our GitHub project will be shared with the Jupyter application container through a bind-mounted directory. Our PostgreSQL data will also be persisted through a bind-mounted directory. This allows us to persist data external to the ephemeral containers. If the containers are restarted or recreated, the data is preserved locally.
Source Code
All source code for this post can be found on GitHub. Use the following command to clone the project. Note this post uses the v2 branch.
git clone \ --branch v2 --single-branch --depth 1 --no-tags \ https://github.com/garystafford/pyspark-setup-demo.git
Source code samples are displayed as GitHub Gists, which may not display correctly on some mobile and social media browsers.
Deploy Docker Stack
To start, create the $HOME/data/postgres directory to store PostgreSQL data files.
mkdir -p ~/data/postgres
This directory will be bind-mounted into the PostgreSQL container on line 41 of the stack.yml file, $HOME/data/postgres:/var/lib/postgresql/data. The HOME environment variable assumes you are working on Linux or macOS and is equivalent to HOMEPATH on Windows.
The Jupyter container’s working directory is set on line 15 of the stack.yml file, working_dir: /home/$USER/work. The local bind-mounted working directory is $PWD/work. This path is bind-mounted to the working directory in the Jupyter container, on line 29 of the Docker stack file, $PWD/work:/home/$USER/work. The PWD environment variable assumes you are working on Linux or macOS (CD on Windows).
By default, the user within the Jupyter container is jovyan. We will override that user with our own local host’s user account, as shown on line 21 of the Docker stack file, NB_USER: $USER. We will use the host’s USER environment variable value (equivalent to USERNAME on Windows). There are additional options for configuring the Jupyter container. Several of those options are used on lines 17–22 of the Docker stack file (gist).
Assuming you have a recent version of Docker installed on your local development machine and running in swarm mode, standing up the stack is as easy as running the following docker command from the root directory of the project.
docker stack deploy -c stack.yml jupyter
The Docker stack consists of a new overlay network, jupyter_demo-net, and three containers. To confirm the stack deployed successfully, run the following docker command.
docker stack ps jupyter --no-trunc
The jupyter/all-spark-notebook Docker image is large, approximately 5 GB. Depending on your Internet connection, if this is the first time you have pulled this image, the stack may take several minutes to enter a running state. Although not required, I usually pull Docker images in advance.
docker pull jupyter/all-spark-notebook:latest docker pull postgres:12-alpine docker pull adminer:latest
To access the Jupyter Notebook application, you need to obtain the Jupyter URL and access token. The Jupyter URL and the access token are output to the Jupyter container log, which can be accessed with the following command.
docker logs $(docker ps | grep jupyter_spark | awk '{print $NF}')
You should observe log output similar to the following. Retrieve the complete URL, for example, http://127.0.0.1:8888/?token=f78cbe..., to access the Jupyter web-based user interface.
From the Jupyter dashboard landing page, you should see all the files in the project’s work/ directory. Note the types of files you can create from the dashboard, including Python 3, R, and Scala (using Apache Toree or spylon-kernal) notebooks, and text. You can also open a Jupyter terminal or create a new Folder from the drop-down menu. At the time of this post, the latest jupyter/all-spark-notebook Docker Image runs Spark 2.4.4, Scala 2.11.12, Python 3.7.3, and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0 Update 222.
Bootstrap Environment
Included in the project is a bootstrap script, bootstrap_jupyter.sh. The script will install the required Python packages using pip, the Python package installer, and a requirement.txt file. The bootstrap script also installs the latest PostgreSQL driver JAR, configures Apache Log4j to reduce log verbosity when submitting Spark jobs, and installs htop. Although these tasks could also be done from a Jupyter terminal or from within a Jupyter notebook, using a bootstrap script ensures you will have a consistent work environment every time you spin up the Jupyter Docker stack. Add or remove items from the bootstrap script as necessary.
That’s it, our new Jupyter environment is ready to start exploring.
Running Python Scripts
One of the simplest tasks we could perform in our new Jupyter environment is running Python scripts. Instead of worrying about installing and maintaining the correct versions of Python and multiple Python packages on your own development machine, we can run Python scripts from within the Jupyter container. At the time of this post update, the latest jupyter/all-spark-notebook Docker image runs Python 3.7.3 and Conda 4.7.12. Let’s start with a simple Python script, 01_simple_script.py.
From a Jupyter terminal window, use the following command to run the script.
python3 01_simple_script.py
You should observe the following output.
Kaggle Datasets
To explore more features of the Jupyter and PySpark, we will use a publicly available dataset from Kaggle. Kaggle is an excellent open-source resource for datasets used for big-data and ML projects. Their tagline is ‘Kaggle is the place to do data science projects’. For this demonstration, we will use the Transactions from a bakery dataset from Kaggle. The dataset is available as a single CSV-format file. A copy is also included in the project.
The ‘Transactions from a bakery’ dataset contains 21,294 rows with 4 columns of data. Although certainly not big data, the dataset is large enough to test out the Spark Jupyter Docker Stack functionality. The data consists of 9,531 customer transactions for 21,294 bakery items between 2016-10-30 and 2017-04-09 (gist).
Submitting Spark Jobs
We are not limited to Jupyter notebooks to interact with Spark. We can also submit scripts directly to Spark from the Jupyter terminal. This is typically how Spark is used in a Production for performing analysis on large datasets, often on a regular schedule, using tools such as Apache Airflow. With Spark, you are load data from one or more data sources. After performing operations and transformations on the data, the data is persisted to a datastore, such as a file or a database, or conveyed to another system for further processing.
The project includes a simple Python PySpark ETL script, 02_pyspark_job.py. The ETL script loads the original Kaggle Bakery dataset from the CSV file into memory, into a Spark DataFrame. The script then performs a simple Spark SQL query, calculating the total quantity of each type of bakery item sold, sorted in descending order. Finally, the script writes the results of the query to a new CSV file, output/items-sold.csv.
Run the script directly from a Jupyter terminal using the following command.
python3 02_pyspark_job.py
An example of the output of the Spark job is shown below.
Typically, you would submit the Spark job using the spark-submit command. Use a Jupyter terminal to run the following command.
$SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit 02_pyspark_job.py
Below, we see the output from the spark-submit command. Printing the results in the output is merely for the purposes of the demo. Typically, Spark jobs are submitted non-interactively, and the results are persisted directly to a datastore or conveyed to another system.
Using the following commands, we can view the resulting CVS file, created by the spark job.
ls -alh output/items-sold.csv/ head -5 output/items-sold.csv/*.csv
An example of the files created by the spark job is shown below. We should have discovered that coffee is the most commonly sold bakery item with 5,471 sales, followed by bread with 3,325 sales.
Interacting with Databases
To demonstrate the flexibility of Jupyter to work with databases, PostgreSQL is part of the Docker Stack. We can read and write data from the Jupyter container to the PostgreSQL instance, running in a separate container. To begin, we will run a SQL script, written in Python, to create our database schema and some test data in a new database table. To do so, we will use the psycopg2, the PostgreSQL database adapter package for the Python, we previously installed into our Jupyter container using the bootstrap script. The below Python script, 03_load_sql.py, will execute a set of SQL statements contained in a SQL file, bakery.sql, against the PostgreSQL container instance.
The SQL file, bakery.sql.
To execute the script, run the following command.
python3 03_load_sql.py
This should result in the following output, if successful.
Adminer
To confirm the SQL script’s success, use Adminer. Adminer (formerly phpMinAdmin) is a full-featured database management tool written in PHP. Adminer natively recognizes PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and MongoDB, among other database engines.
Adminer should be available on localhost port 8080. The password credentials, shown below, are located in the stack.yml file. The server name, postgres, is the name of the PostgreSQL Docker container. This is the domain name the Jupyter container will use to communicate with the PostgreSQL container.
Connecting to the new bakery database with Adminer, we should see the transactions table.
The table should contain 21,293 rows, each with 5 columns of data.
pgAdmin
Another excellent choice for interacting with PostgreSQL, in particular, is pgAdmin 4. It is my favorite tool for the administration of PostgreSQL. Although limited to PostgreSQL, the user interface and administrative capabilities of pgAdmin is superior to Adminer, in my opinion. For brevity, I chose not to include pgAdmin in this post. The Docker stack also contains a pgAdmin container, which has been commented out. To use pgAdmin, just uncomment the container and re-run the Docker stack deploy command. pgAdmin should then be available on localhost port 81. The pgAdmin login credentials are in the Docker stack file.
Developing Jupyter Notebooks
The real power of the Jupyter Docker Stacks containers is Jupyter Notebooks. According to the Jupyter Project, the notebook extends the console-based approach to interactive computing in a qualitatively new direction, providing a web-based application suitable for capturing the whole computation process, including developing, documenting, and executing code, as well as communicating the results. Notebook documents contain the inputs and outputs of an interactive session as well as additional text that accompanies the code but is not meant for execution.
To explore the capabilities of Jupyter notebooks, the project includes two simple Jupyter notebooks. The first notebooks, 04_notebook.ipynb, demonstrates typical PySpark functions, such as loading data from a CSV file and from the PostgreSQL database, performing basic data analysis with Spark SQL including the use of PySpark user-defined functions (UDF), graphing the data using BokehJS, and finally, saving data back to the database, as well as to the fast and efficient Apache Parquet file format. Below we see several notebook cells demonstrating these features.
IDE Integration
Recall, the working directory, containing the GitHub source code for the project, is bind-mounted to the Jupyter container. Therefore, you can also edit any of the files, including notebooks, in your favorite IDE, such as JetBrains PyCharm and Microsoft Visual Studio Code. PyCharm has built-in language support for Jupyter Notebooks, as shown below.
As does Visual Studio Code using the Python extension.
Using Additional Packages
As mentioned in the Introduction, the Jupyter Docker Stacks come ready-to-run, with a wide variety of Python packages to extend their functionality. To demonstrate the use of these packages, the project contains a second Jupyter notebook document, 05_notebook.ipynb. This notebook uses SciPy, the well-known Python package for mathematics, science, and engineering, NumPy, the well-known Python package for scientific computing, and the Plotly Python Graphing Library. While NumPy and SciPy are included on the Jupyter Docker Image, the bootstrap script uses pip to install the required Plotly packages. Similar to Bokeh, shown in the previous notebook, we can use these libraries to create richly interactive data visualizations.
Plotly
To use Plotly from within the notebook, you will first need to sign up for a free account and obtain a username and API key. To ensure we do not accidentally save sensitive Plotly credentials in the notebook, we are using python-dotenv. This Python package reads key/value pairs from a .env file, making them available as environment variables to our notebook. Modify and run the following two commands from a Jupyter terminal to create the .env file and set you Plotly username and API key credentials. Note that the .env file is part of the .gitignore file and will not be committed to back to git, potentially compromising the credentials.
echo "PLOTLY_USERNAME=your-username" >> .env echo "PLOTLY_API_KEY=your-api-key" >> .env
The notebook expects to find the two environment variables, which it uses to authenticate with Plotly.
Shown below, we use Plotly to construct a bar chart of daily bakery items sold. The chart uses SciPy and NumPy to construct a linear fit (regression) and plot a line of best fit for the bakery data and overlaying the vertical bars. The chart also uses SciPy’s Savitzky-Golay Filter to plot the second line, illustrating a smoothing of our bakery data.
Plotly also provides Chart Studio Online Chart Maker. Plotly describes Chart Studio as the world’s most modern enterprise data visualization solutions. We can enhance, stylize, and share our data visualizations using the free version of Chart Studio Cloud.
Jupyter Notebook Viewer
Notebooks can also be viewed using nbviewer, an open-source project under Project Jupyter. Thanks to Rackspace hosting, the nbviewer instance is a free service.
Using nbviewer, below, we see the output of a cell within the 04_notebook.ipynb notebook. View this notebook, here, using nbviewer.
Monitoring Spark Jobs
The Jupyter Docker container exposes Spark’s monitoring and instrumentation web user interface. We can review each completed Spark Job in detail.
We can review details of each stage of the Spark job, including a visualization of the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph), which Spark constructs as part of the job execution plan, using the DAG Scheduler.
We can also review the task composition and timing of each event occurring as part of the stages of the Spark job.
We can also use the Spark interface to review and confirm the runtime environment configuration, including versions of Java, Scala, and Spark, as well as packages available on the Java classpath.
Local Spark Performance
Running Spark on a single node within the Jupyter Docker container on your local development system is not a substitute for a true Spark cluster, Production-grade, multi-node Spark clusters running on bare metal or robust virtualized hardware, and managed with Apache Hadoop YARN, Apache Mesos, or Kubernetes. In my opinion, you should only adjust your Docker resources limits to support an acceptable level of Spark performance for running small exploratory workloads. You will not realistically replace the need to process big data and execute jobs requiring complex calculations on a Production-grade, multi-node Spark cluster.
We can use the following docker stats command to examine the container’s CPU and memory metrics.
docker stats --format "table {{.Name}}\t{{.CPUPerc}}\t{{.MemUsage}}\t{{.MemPerc}}"
Below, we see the stats from the Docker stack’s three containers showing little or no activity.
Compare those stats with the ones shown below, recorded while a notebook was reading and writing data, and executing Spark SQL queries. The CPU and memory output show spikes, but both appear to be within acceptable ranges.
Linux Process Monitors
Another option to examine container performance metrics is top, which is pre-installed in our Jupyter container. For example, execute the following top command from a Jupyter terminal, sorting processes by CPU usage.
top -o %CPU
We should observe the individual performance of each process running in the Jupyter container.
A step up from top is htop, an interactive process viewer for Unix. It was installed in the container by the bootstrap script. For example, we can execute the htop command from a Jupyter terminal, sorting processes by CPU % usage.
htop --sort-key PERCENT_CPU
With htop, observe the individual CPU activity. Here, the four CPUs at the top left of the htop window are the CPUs assigned to Docker. We get insight into the way Spark is using multiple CPUs, as well as other performance metrics, such as memory and swap.
Assuming your development machine is robust, it is easy to allocate and deallocate additional compute resources to Docker if required. Be careful not to allocate excessive resources to Docker, starving your host machine of available compute resources for other applications.
Notebook Extensions
There are many ways to extend the Jupyter Docker Stacks. A popular option is jupyter-contrib-nbextensions. According to their website, the jupyter-contrib-nbextensions package contains a collection of community-contributed unofficial extensions that add functionality to the Jupyter notebook. These extensions are mostly written in JavaScript and will be loaded locally in your browser. Installed notebook extensions can be enabled, either by using built-in Jupyter commands, or more conveniently by using the jupyter_nbextensions_configurator server extension.
The project contains an alternate Docker stack file, stack-nbext.yml. The stack uses an alternative Docker image, garystafford/all-spark-notebook-nbext:latest, This Dockerfile, which builds it, uses the jupyter/all-spark-notebook:latest image as a base image. The alternate image adds in the jupyter-contrib-nbextensions and jupyter_nbextensions_configurator packages. Since Jupyter would need to be restarted after nbextensions is deployed, it cannot be done from within a running jupyter/all-spark-notebook container.
Using this alternate stack, below in our Jupyter container, we see the sizable list of extensions available. Some of my favorite extensions include ‘spellchecker’, ‘Codefolding’, ‘Code pretty’, ‘ExecutionTime’, ‘Table of Contents’, and ‘Toggle all line numbers’.
Below, we see five new extension icons that have been added to the menu bar of 04_notebook.ipynb. You can also observe the extensions have been applied to the notebook, including the table of contents, code-folding, execution time, and line numbering. The spellchecking and pretty code extensions were both also applied.
Conclusion
In this brief post, we have seen how easy it is to get started learning and performing data analytics using Jupyter notebooks, Python, Spark, and PySpark, all thanks to the Jupyter Docker Stacks. We could use this same stack to learn and perform machine learning using Scala and R. Extending the stack’s capabilities is as simple as swapping out this Jupyter image for another, with a different set of tools, as well as adding additional containers to the stack, such as MySQL, MongoDB, RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, and Apache Cassandra.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers, their clients.
Getting Started with Apache Zeppelin on Amazon EMR, using AWS Glue, RDS, and S3: Part 2
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in AWS, Bash Scripting, Big Data, Build Automation, Cloud, DevOps, Python, Software Development on November 30, 2019
Introduction
In Part 1 of this two-part post, we created and configured the AWS resources required to demonstrate the use of Apache Zeppelin on Amazon Elastic MapReduce (EMR). Further, we configured Zeppelin integrations with AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for PostgreSQL, and Amazon Simple Cloud Storage Service (S3) Data Lake. We also covered how to obtain the project’s source code from the two GitHub repositories, zeppelin-emr-demo and zeppelin-emr-config. Below is a high-level architectural diagram of the infrastructure we constructed in Part 1 for this demonstration.
Part 2
In Part 2 of this post, we will explore Apache Zeppelin’s features and integration capabilities with a variety of AWS services using a series of four Zeppelin notebooks. Below is an overview of each Zeppelin notebook with a link to view it using Zepl’s free Notebook Explorer. Zepl was founded by the same engineers that developed Apache Zeppelin. Zepl’s enterprise collaboration platform, built on Apache Zeppelin, enables both Data Science and AI/ML teams to collaborate around data.
Notebook 1
The first notebook uses a small 21k row kaggle dataset, Transactions from a Bakery. The notebook demonstrates Zeppelin’s integration capabilities with the Helium plugin system for adding new chart types, the use of Amazon S3 for data storage and retrieval, and the use of Apache Parquet, a compressed and efficient columnar data storage format, and Zeppelin’s storage integration with GitHub for notebook version control.
Interpreters
When you open a notebook for the first time, you are given the choice of interpreters to bind and unbind to the notebook. The last interpreter in the list shown below, postgres, is the new PostgreSQL JDBC Zeppelin interpreter we created in Part 1 of this post. We will use this interpreter in Notebook 3.
Application Versions
The first two paragraphs of the notebook are used to confirm the version of Spark, Scala, OpenJDK, and Python we are using. Recall we updated the Spark and Python interpreters to use Python 3.
Helium Visualizations
If you recall from Part 1 of the post, we pre-installed several additional Helium Visualizations, including the Ultimate Pie Chart. Below, we see the use of the Spark SQL (%sql) interpreter to query a Spark DataFrame, return results, and visualize the data using the Ultimate Pie Chart. In addition to the pie chart, we see the other pre-installed Helium visualizations proceeding the five default visualizations, in the menu bar. With Zeppelin, all we have to do is write Spark SQL queries against the Spark DataFrame created earlier in the notebook, and Zeppelin will handle the visualization. You have some basic controls over charts using the ‘settings’ option.
Building the Data Lake
Notebook 1 demonstrates how to read and write data to S3. We read and write the Bakery dataset to both CSV-format and Apache Parquet-format, using Spark (PySpark). We also write the results of Spark SQL queries, like the one above, in Parquet, to S3.
With Parquet, data may be split into multiple files, as shown in the S3 bucket directory below. Parquet is much faster to read into a Spark DataFrame than CSV. Spark provides support for both reading and writing Parquet files. We will write all of our data to Parquet in S3, making future re-use of the data much more efficient than downloading data from the Internet, like GroupLens or kaggle, or consuming CSV from S3.
Preview S3 Data
In addition to using the Zeppelin notebook, we can preview data right in the S3 bucket web interface using the Amazon S3 Select feature. This query in place feature is helpful to quickly understand the structure and content of new data files with which you want to interact within Zeppelin.
Saving Changes to GitHub
In Part 1, we configured Zeppelin to read and write the notebooks from your own copy of the GitHub notebook repository. Using the ‘version control’ menu item, changes made to the notebooks can be committed directly to GitHub.
In GitHub, note the committer is the zeppelin user.
Notebook 2
The second notebook demonstrates the use of a single-node and multi-node Amazon EMR cluster for the exploration and analysis of public datasets ranging from approximately 100k rows up to 27MM rows, using Zeppelin. We will use the latest GroupLens MovieLens rating datasets to examine the performance characteristics of Zeppelin, using Spark, on single- verses multi-node EMR clusters for analyzing big data using a variety of Amazon EC2 Instance Types.
Multi-Node EMR Cluster
If you recall from Part 1, we waited to create this cluster due to the compute costs of running the cluster’s large EC2 instances. You should understand the cost of these resources before proceeding, and that you ensure they are destroyed immediately upon completion of the demonstration to minimize your expenses.
Normalized Instance Hours
Understanding the costs of EMR requires understanding the concept of normalized instance hours. Cluster displayed in the EMR AWS Console contains two columns, ‘Elapsed time’ and ‘Normalized instance hours’. The ‘Elapsed time’ column reflects the actual wall-clock time the cluster was used. The ‘Normalized instance hours’ column indicates the approximate number of compute hours the cluster has used, rounded up to the nearest hour.
Normalized instance hours calculations are based on a normalization factor. The normalization factor ranges from 1 for a small instance, up to 64 for an 8xlarge. Based on the type and quantity of instances in our multi-node cluster, we would use approximately 56 compute hours (aka normalized instance hours) for every one hour of wall-clock time our EMR cluster is running. Note the multi-node cluster used in our demo, highlighted in yellow above. The cluster ran for two hours, which equated to 112 normalized instance hours.
Create the Multi-Node Cluster
Create the multi-node EMR cluster using CloudFormation. Change the following nine variable values, then run the emr cloudformation create-stack API command, using the AWS CLI.
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
EC2_KEY_NAME="your-key-name"
LOG_BUCKET="aws-logs-your_aws_account_id-your_region"
GITHUB_ACCOUNT="your-account-name"
GITHUB_REPO="your-new-project-name"
GITHUB_TOKEN="your-token-value"
MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE="m5.xlarge" # optional
CORE_INSTANCE_TYPE="m5.2xlarge" # optional
CORE_INSTANCE_COUNT=3 # optional
aws cloudformation create-stack \
--stack-name zeppelin-emr-prod-stack \
--template-body file://cloudformation/emr_cluster.yml \
--parameters ParameterKey=ZeppelinDemoBucket,ParameterValue=${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET} \
ParameterKey=Ec2KeyName,ParameterValue=${EC2_KEY_NAME} \
ParameterKey=LogBucket,ParameterValue=${LOG_BUCKET} \
ParameterKey=MasterInstanceType,ParameterValue=${MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE} \
ParameterKey=CoreInstanceType,ParameterValue=${CORE_INSTANCE_TYPE} \
ParameterKey=CoreInstanceCount,ParameterValue=${CORE_INSTANCE_COUNT} \
ParameterKey=GitHubAccount,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_ACCOUNT} \
ParameterKey=GitHubRepository,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_REPO} \
ParameterKey=GitHubToken,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_TOKEN}
Use the Amazon EMR web interface to confirm the success of the CloudFormation stack. The fully-provisioned cluster should be in the ‘Waiting’ state when ready.
Configuring the EMR Cluster
Refer to Part 1 for the configuration steps necessary to prepare the EMR cluster and Zeppelin before continuing. Repeat all the steps used for the single-node cluster.
Monitoring with Ganglia
In Part 1, we installed Ganglia as part of creating the EMR cluster. Ganglia, according to its website, is a scalable distributed monitoring system for high-performance computing systems such as clusters and grids. Ganglia can be used to evaluate the performance of the single-node and multi-node EMR clusters. With Ganglia, we can easily view cluster and individual instance CPU, memory, and network I/O performance.
Ganglia Example: Cluster CPU
Ganglia Example: Cluster Memory
Ganglia Example: Cluster Network I/O
YARN Resource Manager
The YARN Resource Manager Web UI is also available on our EMR cluster. Using the Resource Manager, we can view the compute resource load on the cluster, as well as the individual EMR Core nodes. Below, we see that the multi-node cluster has 24 vCPUs and 72 GiB of memory available, split evenly across the three Core cluster nodes.
You might recall, the m5.2xlarge EC2 instance type, used for the three Core nodes, each contains 8 vCPUs and 32 GiB of memory. However, by default, although all 8 vCPUs are available for computation per node, only 24 GiB of the node’s 32 GiB of memory are available for computation. EMR ensures a portion of the memory on each node is reserved for other system processes. The maximum available memory is controlled by the YARN memory configuration option, yarn.scheduler.maximum-allocation-mb.
The YARN Resource Manager preview above shows the load on the Code nodes as Notebook 2 is executing the Spark SQL queries on the large MovieLens with 27MM ratings. Note that only 4 of the 24 vCPUs (16.6%) are in use, but that 70.25 of the 72 GiB (97.6%) of available memory is being used. According to Spark, because of the in-memory nature of most Spark computations, Spark programs can be bottlenecked by any resource in the cluster: CPU, network bandwidth, or memory. Most often, if the data fits in memory, the bottleneck is network bandwidth. In this case, memory appears to be the most constrained resource. Using memory-optimized instances, such as r4 or r5 instance types, might be more effective for the core nodes than the m5 instance types.
MovieLens Datasets
By changing one variable in the notebook, we can work with the latest, smaller GroupLens MovieLens dataset containing approximately 100k rows (ml-latest-small) or the larger dataset, containing approximately 27M rows (ml-latest). For this demo, try both datasets on both the single-node and multi-node clusters. Compare the Spark SQL paragraph execution times for each of the four variations, including single-node with the small dataset, single-node with the large dataset, multi-node with the small dataset, and multi-node with the large dataset. Observe how fast the SQL queries are executed on the single-node versus multi-node cluster. Try switching to a different Core node instance type, such as r5.2xlarge. Try creating a cluster with additional Core nodes. How is the compute time effected?
Terminate the multi-node EMR cluster to save yourself the expense before continuing to Notebook 3.
aws cloudformation delete-stack \
--stack-name=zeppelin-emr-prod-stack
Notebook 3
The third notebook demonstrates Amazon EMR and Zeppelin’s integration capabilities with AWS Glue Data Catalog as an Apache Hive-compatible metastore for Spark SQL. We will create an Amazon S3-based Data Lake using the AWS Glue Data Catalog and a set of AWS Glue Crawlers.
Glue Crawlers
Before continuing with Notebook 3, run the two Glue Crawlers using the AWS CLI.
aws glue start-crawler --name bakery-transactions-crawler aws glue start-crawler --name movie-ratings-crawler
The two Crawlers will create a total of seven tables in the Glue Data Catalog database.
If we examine the Glue Data Catalog database, we should now observe several tables, one for each dataset found in the S3 bucket. The location of each dataset is shown in the ‘Location’ column of the tables view.
From the Zeppelin notebook, we can even use Spark SQL to query the AWS Glue Data Catalog, itself, for its databases and the tables within them.
According to Amazon, the Glue Data Catalog tables and databases are containers for the metadata definitions that define a schema for underlying source data. Using Zeppelin’s SQL interpreter, we can query the Data Catalog database and return the underlying source data. The SQL query example, below, demonstrates how we can perform a join across two tables in the data catalog database, representing two different data sources, and return results.
Notebook 4
The fourth notebook demonstrates Zeppelin’s ability to integrate with an external data source. In this case, we will interact with data in an Amazon RDS PostgreSQL relational database using three methods, including the Psycopg 2 PostgreSQL adapter for Python, Spark’s native JDBC capability, and Zeppelin’s JDBC Interpreter.
First, we create a new schema and four related tables for the RDS PostgreSQL movie ratings database, using the Psycopg 2 PostgreSQL adapter for Python and the SQL file we copied to S3 in Part 1.
The RDS database’s schema, shown below, approximates the schema of the four CSV files from the GroupLens MovieLens rating dataset we used in Notebook 2.
Since the schema of the PostgreSQL database matches the MovieLens dataset files, we can import the data from the CVS files, downloaded from GroupLens, directly into the RDS database, again using the Psycopg PostgreSQL adapter for Python.
According to the Spark documentation, Spark SQL also includes a data source that can read data from other databases using JDBC. Using Spark’s JDBC capability and the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver we installed in Part 1, we can perform Spark SQL queries against the RDS database using PySpark (%spark.pyspark). Below, we see a paragraph example of reading the RDS database’s movies table, using Spark.
As a third method of querying the RDS database, we can use the custom Zeppelin PostgreSQL JDBC interpreter (%postgres) we created in Part 1. Although the default driver of the JDBC interpreter is set as PostgreSQL, and the associated JAR is included with Zeppelin, we overrode that older JAR, with the latest PostgreSQL JDBC Driver JAR.
Using the %postgres interpreter, we query the RDS database’s public schema, and return the four database tables we created earlier in the notebook.
Again, below, using the %postgres interpreter in the notebook’s paragraph, we query the RDS database and return data, which we then visualize using Zeppelin’s bar chart. Finally, note the use of Zeppelin Dynamic Forms in this example. Dynamic Forms allows Zeppelin to dynamically creates input forms, whose input values are then available to use programmatically. Here, we use two form input values to control the data returned from our query and the resulting visualization.
Conclusion
In this two-part post, we learned how effectively Apache Zeppelin integrates with Amazon EMR. We also learned how to extend Zeppelin’s capabilities, using AWS Glue, Amazon RDS, and Amazon S3 as a Data Lake. Beyond what was covered in this post, there are dozens of more Zeppelin and EMR features, as well as dozens of more AWS services that integrate with Zeppelin and EMR, for you to discover.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
Getting Started with Apache Zeppelin on Amazon EMR, using AWS Glue, RDS, and S3: Part 1
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in AWS, Bash Scripting, Big Data, Build Automation, Cloud, DevOps, Python, Software Development on November 22, 2019
Introduction
There is little question big data analytics, data science, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML), a subcategory of AI, have all experienced a tremendous surge in popularity over the last 3–5 years. Behind the hype cycles and marketing buzz, these technologies are having a significant influence on many aspects of our modern lives. Due to their popularity, commercial enterprises, academic institutions, and the public sector have all rushed to develop hardware and software solutions to decrease the barrier to entry and increase the velocity of ML and Data Scientists and Engineers.
Data Science: 5-Year Search Trend (courtesy Google Trends)
Machine Learning: 5-Year Search Trend (courtesy Google Trends)
Technologies
All three major cloud providers, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, have rapidly maturing big data analytics, data science, and AI and ML services. AWS, for example, introduced Amazon Elastic MapReduce (EMR) in 2009, primarily as an Apache Hadoop-based big data processing service. Since then, according to Amazon, EMR has evolved into a service that uses Apache Spark, Apache Hadoop, and several other leading open-source frameworks to quickly and cost-effectively process and analyze vast amounts of data. More recently, in late 2017, Amazon released SageMaker, a service that provides the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning models quickly and securely.
Simultaneously, organizations are building solutions that integrate and enhance these Cloud-based big data analytics, data science, AI, and ML services. One such example is Apache Zeppelin. Similar to the immensely popular Project Jupyter and the newly open-sourced Netflix’s Polynote, Apache Zeppelin is a web-based, polyglot, computational notebook. Zeppelin enables data-driven, interactive data analytics and document collaboration using a number of interpreters such as Scala (with Apache Spark), Python (with Apache Spark), Spark SQL, JDBC, Markdown, Shell and so on. Zeppelin is one of the core applications supported natively by Amazon EMR.
In the following two-part post, we will explore the use of Apache Zeppelin on EMR for data science and data analytics using a series of Zeppelin notebooks. The notebooks feature the use of AWS Glue, the fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics. The notebooks also feature the use of Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for PostgreSQL and Amazon Simple Cloud Storage Service (S3). Amazon S3 will serve as a Data Lake to store our unstructured data. Given the current choice of Zeppelin’s more than twenty different interpreters, we will use Python3 and Apache Spark, specifically Spark SQL and PySpark, for all notebooks.
We will build an economical single-node EMR cluster for data exploration, as well as a larger multi-node EMR cluster for analyzing large data sets. Amazon S3 will be used to store input and output data, while intermediate results are stored in the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) on the EMR cluster. Amazon provides a good overview of EMR architecture. Below is a high-level architectural diagram of the infrastructure we will construct during Part 1 for this demonstration.
Notebook Features
Below is an overview of each Zeppelin notebook with a link to view it using Zepl’s free Notebook Explorer. Zepl was founded by the same engineers that developed Apache Zeppelin, including Moonsoo Lee, Zepl CTO and creator for Apache Zeppelin. Zepl’s enterprise collaboration platform, built on Apache Zeppelin, enables both Data Science and AI/ML teams to collaborate around data.
Notebook 1
The first notebook uses a small 21k row kaggle dataset, Transactions from a Bakery. The notebook demonstrates Zeppelin’s integration capabilities with the Helium plugin system for adding new chart types, the use of Amazon S3 for data storage and retrieval, and the use of Apache Parquet, a compressed and efficient columnar data storage format, and Zeppelin’s storage integration with GitHub for notebook version control.
Notebook 2
The second notebook demonstrates the use of a single-node and multi-node Amazon EMR cluster for the exploration and analysis of public datasets ranging from approximately 100k rows up to 27MM rows, using Zeppelin. We will use the latest GroupLens MovieLens rating datasets to examine the performance characteristics of Zeppelin, using Spark, on single- verses multi-node EMR clusters for analyzing big data using a variety of Amazon EC2 Instance Types.
Notebook 3
The third notebook demonstrates Amazon EMR and Zeppelin’s integration capabilities with AWS Glue Data Catalog as an Apache Hive-compatible metastore for Spark SQL. We will create an Amazon S3-based Data Lake using the AWS Glue Data Catalog and a set of AWS Glue Crawlers.
Notebook 4
The fourth notebook demonstrates Zeppelin’s ability to integrate with an external data source. In this case, we will interact with data in an Amazon RDS PostgreSQL relational database using three methods, including the Psycopg 2 PostgreSQL adapter for Python, Spark’s native JDBC capability, and Zeppelin’s JDBC Interpreter.
Demonstration
In Part 1 of the post, as a DataOps Engineer, we will create and configure the AWS resources required to demonstrate the use of Apache Zeppelin on EMR, using an AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon RDS PostgreSQL database, and an S3-based data lake. In Part 2 of this post, as a Data Scientist, we will explore Apache Zeppelin’s features and integration capabilities with a variety of AWS services using the Zeppelin notebooks.
Source Code
The demonstration’s source code is contained in two public GitHub repositories. The first repository, zeppelin-emr-demo, includes the four Zeppelin notebooks, organized according to the conventions of Zeppelin’s pluggable notebook storage mechanisms.
. ├── 2ERVVKTCG │ └── note.json ├── 2ERYY923A │ └── note.json ├── 2ESH8DGFS │ └── note.json ├── 2EUZKQXX7 │ └── note.json ├── LICENSE └── README.md
Zeppelin GitHub Storage
During the demonstration, changes made to your copy of the Zeppelin notebooks running on EMR will be automatically pushed back to GitHub when a commit occurs. To accomplish this, instead of just cloning a local copy of my zeppelin-emr-demo project repository, you will want your own copy, within your personal GitHub account. You could folk my zeppelin-emr-demo GitHub repository or copy a clone into your own GitHub repository.
To make a copy of the project in your own GitHub account, first, create a new empty repository on GitHub, for example, ‘my-zeppelin-emr-demo-copy’. Then, execute the following commands from your terminal, to clone the original project repository to your local environment, and finally, push it to your GitHub account.
# change me
GITHUB_ACCOUNT="your-account-name" # i.e. garystafford
GITHUB_REPO="your-new-project-name" # i.e. my-zeppelin-emr-demo-copy
# shallow clone into new directory
git clone --branch master \
--single-branch --depth 1 --no-tags \
https://github.com/garystafford/zeppelin-emr-demo.git \
${GITHUB_REPO}
# re-initialize repository
cd ${GITHUB_REPO}
rm -rf .git
git init
# re-commit code
git add -A
git commit -m "Initial commit of my copy of zeppelin-emr-demo"
# push to your repo
git remote add origin \
https://github.com/$GITHUB_ACCOUNT/$GITHUB_REPO.git
git push -u origin master
GitHub Personal Access Token
To automatically push changes to your GitHub repository when a commit occurs, Zeppelin will need a GitHub personal access token. Create a personal access token with the scope shown below. Be sure to keep the token secret. Make sure you do not accidentally check your token value into your source code on GitHub. To minimize the risk, change or delete the token after completing the demo.
The second repository, zeppelin-emr-config, contains the necessary bootstrap files, CloudFormation templates, and PostgreSQL DDL (Data Definition Language) SQL script.
.
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── bootstrap
│ ├── bootstrap.sh
│ ├── emr-config.json
│ ├── helium.json
├── cloudformation
│ ├── crawler.yml
│ ├── emr_single_node.yml
│ ├── emr_cluster.yml
│ └── rds_postgres.yml
└── sql
└── ratings.sql
Use the following AWS CLI command to clone the GitHub repository to your local environment.
git clone --branch master \
--single-branch --depth 1 --no-tags \
https://github.com/garystafford/zeppelin-emr-demo-setup.git
Requirements
To follow along with the demonstration, you will need an AWS Account, an existing Amazon S3 bucket to store EMR configuration and data, and an EC2 key pair. You will also need a current version of the AWS CLI installed in your work environment. Due to the particular EMR features, we will be using, I recommend using the us-east-1 AWS Region to create the demonstration’s resources.
# create secure emr config and data bucket
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
aws s3api create-bucket \
--bucket ${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET}
aws s3api put-public-access-block \
--bucket ${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET} \
--public-access-block-configuration \
BlockPublicAcls=true,IgnorePublicAcls=true,BlockPublicPolicy=true,RestrictPublicBuckets=true
Copy Configuration Files to S3
To start, we need to copy three configuration files, bootstrap.sh, helium.json, and ratings.sql, from the zeppelin-emr-demo-setup project directory to our S3 bucket. Change the ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET variable value, then run the following s3 cp API command, using the AWS CLI. The three files will be copied to a bootstrap directory within your S3 bucket.
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
aws s3 cp bootstrap/bootstrap.sh s3://${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET}/bootstrap/
aws s3 cp bootstrap/helium.json s3://${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET}/bootstrap/
aws s3 cp sql/ratings.sql s3://${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET}/bootstrap/
Below, sample output from copying local files to S3.
Create AWS Resources
We will start by creating most of the required AWS resources for the demonstration using three CloudFormation templates. We will create a single-node Amazon EMR cluster, an Amazon RDS PostgresSQL database, an AWS Glue Data Catalog database, two AWS Glue Crawlers, and a Glue IAM Role. We will wait to create the multi-node EMR cluster due to the compute costs of running large EC2 instances in the cluster. You should understand the cost of these resources before proceeding, and that you ensure they are destroyed immediately upon completion of the demonstration to minimize your expenses.
Single-Node EMR Cluster
We will start by creating the single-node Amazon EMR cluster, consisting of just one master node with no core or task nodes (a cluster of one). All operations will take place on the master node.
Default EMR Resources
The following EMR instructions assume you have already created at least one EMR cluster in the past, in your current AWS Region, using the EMR web interface with the ‘Create Cluster – Quick Options’ option. Creating a cluster this way creates several additional AWS resources, such as the EMR_EC2_DefaultRole EC2 instance profile, the default EMR_DefaultRole EMR IAM Role, and the default EMR S3 log bucket.
If you haven’t created any EMR clusters using the EMR ‘Create Cluster – Quick Options’ in the past, don’t worry, you can also create the required resources with a few quick AWS CLI commands. Change the following LOG_BUCKET variable value, then run the aws emr and aws s3api API commands, using the AWS CLI. The LOG_BUCKET variable value follows the convention of aws-logs-awsaccount-region. For example, aws-logs-012345678901-us-east-1.
# create emr roles
aws emr create-default-roles
# create log secure bucket
# change me
LOG_BUCKET="aws-logs-your_aws_account_id-your_region"
aws s3api create-bucket --bucket ${LOG_BUCKET}
aws s3api put-public-access-block --bucket ${LOG_BUCKET} \
--public-access-block-configuration \
BlockPublicAcls=true,IgnorePublicAcls=true,BlockPublicPolicy=true,RestrictPublicBuckets=true
The new EMR IAM Roles can be viewed in the IAM Roles web interface.
Often, I see tutorials that reference these default EMR resources from the AWS CLI or CloudFormation, without any understanding or explanation of how they are created.
EMR Bootstrap Script
As part of creating our EMR cluster, the CloudFormation template, emr_single_node.yml, will call the bootstrap script we copied to S3, earlier, bootstrap.sh. The bootstrap script pre-installs required Python and Linux software packages, and the PostgreSQL driver JAR. The bootstrap script also clones your copy of the zeppelin-emr-demo GitHub repository.
#!/bin/bash
set -ex
if [[ $# -ne 2 ]] ; then
echo "Script requires two arguments"
exit 1
fi
GITHUB_ACCOUNT=$1
GITHUB_REPO=$2
# install extra python packages
sudo python3 -m pip install psycopg2-binary boto3
# install extra linux packages
yes | sudo yum install git htop
# clone github repo
cd /tmp
git clone "https://github.com/${GITHUB_ACCOUNT}/${GITHUB_REPO}.git"
# install extra jars
POSTGRES_JAR="postgresql-42.2.8.jar"
wget -nv "https://jdbc.postgresql.org/download/${POSTGRES_JAR}"
sudo chown -R hadoop:hadoop ${POSTGRES_JAR}
mkdir -p /home/hadoop/extrajars/
cp ${POSTGRES_JAR} /home/hadoop/extrajars/
EMR Application Configuration
The EMR CloudFormation template will also modify the EMR cluster’s Spark and Zeppelin application configurations. Amongst other configuration properties, the template sets the default Python version to Python3, instructs Zeppelin to use the cloned GitHub notebook directory path, and adds the PostgreSQL Driver JAR to the JVM ClassPath. Below we can see the configuration properties applied to an existing EMR cluster.
EMR Application Versions
As of the date of this post, EMR is at version 5.28.0. Below, as shown in the EMR web interface, are the current (21) applications and frameworks available for installation on EMR.
For this demo, we will install Apache Spark v2.4.4, Ganglia v3.7.2, and Zeppelin 0.8.2.
Apache Zeppelin: Web Interface
Apache Spark: DAG Visualization
Ganglia: Cluster CPU Monitoring
Create the EMR CloudFormation Stack
Change the following (7) variable values, then run the emr cloudformation create-stack API command, using the AWS CLI.
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
EC2_KEY_NAME="your-key-name"
LOG_BUCKET="aws-logs-your_aws_account_id-your_region"
GITHUB_ACCOUNT="your-account-name" # i.e. garystafford
GITHUB_REPO="your-new-project-name" # i.e. my-zeppelin-emr-demo
GITHUB_TOKEN="your-token-value"
MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE="m5.xlarge" # optional
aws cloudformation create-stack \
--stack-name zeppelin-emr-dev-stack \
--template-body file://cloudformation/emr_single_node.yml \
--parameters ParameterKey=ZeppelinDemoBucket,ParameterValue=${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET} \
ParameterKey=Ec2KeyName,ParameterValue=${EC2_KEY_NAME} \
ParameterKey=LogBucket,ParameterValue=${LOG_BUCKET} \
ParameterKey=MasterInstanceType,ParameterValue=${MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE} \
ParameterKey=GitHubAccount,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_ACCOUNT} \
ParameterKey=GitHubRepository,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_REPO} \
ParameterKey=GitHubToken,ParameterValue=${GITHUB_TOKEN}
You can use the Amazon EMR web interface to confirm the results of the CloudFormation stack. The cluster should be in the ‘Waiting’ state.
PostgreSQL on Amazon RDS
Next, create a simple, single-AZ, single-master, non-replicated Amazon RDS PostgreSQL database, using the included CloudFormation template, rds_postgres.yml. We will use this database in Notebook 4. For the demo, I have selected the current-generation general purpose db.m4.large EC2 instance type to run PostgreSQL. You can easily change the instance type to another RDS-supported instance type to suit your own needs.
Change the following (3) variable values, then run the cloudformation create-stack API command, using the AWS CLI.
# change me
DB_MASTER_USER="your-db-username" # i.e. masteruser
DB_MASTER_PASSWORD="your-db-password" # i.e. 5up3r53cr3tPa55w0rd
MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE="db.m4.large" # optional
aws cloudformation create-stack \
--stack-name zeppelin-rds-stack \
--template-body file://cloudformation/rds_postgres.yml \
--parameters ParameterKey=DBUser,ParameterValue=${DB_MASTER_USER} \
ParameterKey=DBPassword,ParameterValue=${DB_MASTER_PASSWORD} \
ParameterKey=DBInstanceClass,ParameterValue=${MASTER_INSTANCE_TYPE}
You can use the Amazon RDS web interface to confirm the results of the CloudFormation stack.
AWS Glue
Next, create the AWS Glue Data Catalog database, the Apache Hive-compatible metastore for Spark SQL, two AWS Glue Crawlers, and a Glue IAM Role (ZeppelinDemoCrawlerRole), using the included CloudFormation template, crawler.yml. The AWS Glue Data Catalog database will be used in Notebook 3.
Change the following variable value, then run the cloudformation create-stack API command, using the AWS CLI.
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
aws cloudformation create-stack \
--stack-name zeppelin-crawlers-stack \
--template-body file://cloudformation/crawler.yml \
--parameters ParameterKey=ZeppelinDemoBucket,ParameterValue=${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET} \
--capabilities CAPABILITY_NAMED_IAM
You can use the AWS Glue web interface to confirm the results of the CloudFormation stack. Note the Data Catalog database and the two Glue Crawlers. We will not run the two crawlers until Part 2 of the post, so no tables will exist in the Data Catalog database, yet.
At this point in the demonstration, you should have successfully created a single-node Amazon EMR cluster, an Amazon RDS PostgresSQL database, and several AWS Glue resources, all using CloudFormation templates.
Post-EMR Creation Configuration
RDS Security
For the new EMR cluster to communicate with the RDS PostgreSQL database, we need to ensure that port 5432 is open from the RDS database’s VPC security group, which is the default VPC security group, to the security groups of the EMR nodes. Obtain the Group ID of the ElasticMapReduce-master and ElasticMapReduce-slave Security Groups from the EMR web interface.
Access the Security Group for the RDS database using the RDS web interface. Change the inbound rule for port 5432 to include both Security Group IDs.
SSH to EMR Master Node
In addition to the bootstrap script and configurations, we already applied to the EMR cluster, we need to make several post-EMR creation configuration changes to the EMR cluster for our demonstration. These changes will require SSH’ing to the EMR cluster. Using the master node’s public DNS address and SSH command provided in the EMR web console, SSH into the master node.
If you cannot access the node using SSH, check that port 22 is open on the associated EMR master node IAM Security Group (ElasticMapReduce-master) to your IP address or address range.
Git Permissions
We need to change permissions on the git repository we installed during the EMR bootstrapping phase. Typically, with an EC2 instance, you perform operations as the ec2-user user. With Amazon EMR, you often perform actions as the hadoop user. With Zeppelin on EMR, the notebooks perform operations, including interacting with the git repository as the zeppelin user. As a result of the bootstrap.sh script, the contents of the git repository directory, /tmp/zeppelin-emr-demo/, are owned by the hadoop user and group by default.
We will change their owner to the zeppelin user and group. We could not perform this step as part of the bootstrap script since the the zeppelin user and group did not exist at the time the script was executed.
cd /tmp/zeppelin-emr-demo/ sudo chown -R zeppelin:zeppelin .
The results should look similar to the following output.
Pre-Install Visualization Packages
Next, we will pre-install several Apache Zeppelin Visualization packages. According to the Zeppelin website, an Apache Zeppelin Visualization is a pluggable package that can be loaded/unloaded on runtime through the Helium framework in Zeppelin. We can use them just like any other built-in visualization in the notebook. A Visualization is a javascript npm package. For example, here is a link to the ultimate-pie-chart on the public npm registry.
We can pre-load plugins by replacing the /usr/lib/zeppelin/conf/helium.json file with the version of helium.json we copied to S3, earlier, and restarting Zeppelin. If you have a lot of Visualizations or package types or use any DataOps automation to create EMR clusters, this approach is much more efficient and repeatable than manually loading plugins using the Zeppelin UI, each time you create a new EMR cluster. Below, the helium.json file, which pre-loads (8) Visualization packages.
{
"enabled": {
"ultimate-pie-chart": "ultimate-pie-chart@0.0.2",
"ultimate-column-chart": "ultimate-column-chart@0.0.2",
"ultimate-scatter-chart": "ultimate-scatter-chart@0.0.2",
"ultimate-range-chart": "ultimate-range-chart@0.0.2",
"ultimate-area-chart": "ultimate-area-chart@0.0.1",
"ultimate-line-chart": "ultimate-line-chart@0.0.1",
"zeppelin-bubblechart": "zeppelin-bubblechart@0.0.4",
"zeppelin-highcharts-scatterplot": "zeppelin-highcharts-scatterplot@0.0.2"
},
"packageConfig": {},
"bundleDisplayOrder": [
"ultimate-pie-chart",
"ultimate-column-chart",
"ultimate-scatter-chart",
"ultimate-range-chart",
"ultimate-area-chart",
"ultimate-line-chart",
"zeppelin-bubblechart",
"zeppelin-highcharts-scatterplot"
]
}
Run the following commands to load the plugins and adjust the permissions on the file.
# change me
ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET="your-bucket-name"
sudo aws s3 cp s3://${ZEPPELIN_DEMO_BUCKET}/bootstrap/helium.json \
/usr/lib/zeppelin/conf/helium.json
sudo chown zeppelin:zeppelin /usr/lib/zeppelin/conf/helium.json
Create New JDBC Interpreter
Lastly, we need to create a new Zeppelin JDBC Interpreter to connect to our RDS database. By default, Zeppelin has several interpreters installed. You can review a list of available interpreters using the following command.
sudo sh /usr/lib/zeppelin/bin/install-interpreter.sh --list
The new JDBC interpreter will allow us to connect to our RDS PostgreSQL database, using Java Database Connectivity (JDBC). First, ensure all available interpreters are installed, including the current Zeppelin JDBC driver (org.apache.zeppelin:zeppelin-jdbc:0.8.0) to /usr/lib/zeppelin/interpreter/jdbc.
Creating a new interpreter is a two-part process. In this stage, we install the required interpreter files on the master node using the following command. Then later, in the Zeppelin web interface, we will configure the new PostgreSQL JDBC interpreter. Note we must provide a unique name for the interpreter (I chose ‘postgres’ in this case), which we will refer to in part two of the interpreter creation process.
sudo sh /usr/lib/zeppelin/bin/install-interpreter.sh --all
sudo sh /usr/lib/zeppelin/bin/install-interpreter.sh \
--name "postgres" \
--artifact org.apache.zeppelin:zeppelin-jdbc:0.8.0
To complete the post-EMR creation configuration on the master node, we must restart Zeppelin for our changes to take effect.
sudo stop zeppelin && sudo start zeppelin
In my experience, it could take 2–3 minutes for the Zeppelin UI to become fully responsive after a restart.
Zeppelin Web Interface Access
With all the EMR application configuration complete, we will access the Zeppelin web interface running on the master node. Use the Zeppelin connection information provided in the EMR web interface to setup SSH tunneling to the Zeppelin web interface, running on the master node. Using this method, we can also access the Spark History Server, Ganglia, and Hadoop Resource Manager web interfaces; all links are provided from EMR.
To set up a web connection to the applications installed on the EMR cluster, I am using FoxyProxy as a proxy management tool with Google Chrome.
If everything is working so far, you should see the Zeppelin web interface with all four Zeppelin notebooks available from the cloned GitHub repository. You will be logged in as the anonymous user. Zeppelin offers authentication for accessing notebooks on the EMR cluster. For brevity, we will not cover setting up authentication in Zeppelin, using Shiro Authentication.
To confirm the path to the local, cloned copy of the GitHub notebook repository, is correct, check the Notebook Repos interface, accessible under the Settings dropdown (anonymous user) in the upper right of the screen. The value should match the ZEPPELIN_NOTEBOOK_DIR configuration property value in the emr_single_node.yml CloudFormation template we executed earlier.
To confirm the Helium Visualizations were pre-installed correctly, using the helium.json file, open the Helium interface, accessible under the Settings dropdown (anonymous user) in the upper right of the screen.
Note the enabled visualizations. And, it is easy to enable additional plugins through the web interface.
New PostgreSQL JDBC Interpreter
If you recall, earlier, we install the required interpreter files on the master node using the following command using the bootstrap script. We will now complete the process of configuring the new PostgreSQL JDBC interpreter. Open the Interpreter interface, accessible under the Settings dropdown (anonymous user) in the upper right of the screen.
The title of the new interpreter must match the name we used to install the interpreter files, ‘postgres’. The interpreter group will be ‘jdbc’. There are, minimally, three properties we need to configure for your specific RDS database instance, including default.url, default.user, and default.password. These should match the values you used to create your RDS instance, earlier. Make sure to includes the database name in the default.url. An example is shown below.
default.url: jdbc:postgresql://zeppelin-demo.abcd1234efg56.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com:5432/ratings default.user: masteruser default.password: 5up3r53cr3tPa55w0rd
We also need to provide a path to the PostgreSQL driver JAR dependency. This path is the location where we placed the JAR using the bootstrap.sh script, earlier, /home/hadoop/extrajars/postgresql-42.2.8.jar. Save the new interpreter and make sure it starts successfully (shows a green icon).
Switch Interpreters to Python 3
The last thing we need to do is change the Spark and Python interpreters to use Python 3 instead of the default Python 2. On the same screen you used to create a new interpreter, modify the Spark and Python interpreters. First, for the Python interpreter, change the zeppelin.python property to python3.
Next, for the Spark interpreter, change the zeppelin.pyspark.python property to python3.
Part 2
In Part 1 of this post, we created and configured the AWS resources required to demonstrate the use of Apache Zeppelin on EMR, using an AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon RDS PostgreSQL database, and an S3 data lake. In Part 2 of this post, we will explore some of Apache Zeppelin’s features and integration capabilities with a variety of AWS services using the notebooks.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
Event-driven, Serverless Architectures with AWS Lambda, SQS, DynamoDB, and API Gateway
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in AWS, Bash Scripting, Cloud, DevOps, JavaScript, Python, Software Development on October 4, 2019
Introduction
In this post, we will explore modern application development using an event-driven, serverless architecture on AWS. To demonstrate this architecture, we will integrate several fully-managed services, all part of the AWS Serverless Computing platform, including Lambda, API Gateway, SQS, S3, and DynamoDB. The result will be an application composed of small, easily deployable, loosely coupled, independently scalable, serverless components.
What is ‘Event-Driven’?
According to Otavio Ferreira, Manager, Amazon SNS, and James Hood, Senior Software Development Engineer, in their AWS Compute Blog, Enriching Event-Driven Architectures with AWS Event Fork Pipelines, “Many customers are choosing to build event-driven applications in which subscriber services automatically perform work in response to events triggered by publisher services. This architectural pattern can make services more reusable, interoperable, and scalable.” This description of an event-driven architecture perfectly captures the essence of the following post. All interactions between application components in this post will be as a direct result of triggering an event.
What is ‘Serverless’?
Mistakingly, many of us think of serverless as just functions (aka Function-as-a-Service or FaaS). When it comes to functions on AWS, Lambda is just one of many fully-managed services that make up the AWS Serverless Computing platform. So, what is ‘serverless’? According to AWS, “Serverless applications don’t require provisioning, maintaining, and administering servers for backend components such as compute, databases, storage, stream processing, message queueing, and more.”
As a Developer, one of my favorite features of serverless is the cost, or lack thereof. With serverless on AWS, you pay for consistent throughput or execution duration rather than by server unit, and, at least on AWS, you don’t pay for idle resources. This is not always true of ‘serverless’ offerings on other leading Cloud platforms. Remember, if you’re paying for it but not using it, it’s not serverless.
If you’re paying for it but not using it, it’s not serverless.
Demonstration
To demonstrate an event-driven, serverless architecture, we will build, package, and deploy an application capable of extracting messages from CSV files placed in S3, transforming those messages, queueing them to SQS, and finally, writing the messages to DynamoDB, using Lambda functions throughout. We will also expose a RESTful API, via API Gateway, to perform CRUD-like operations on those messages in DynamoDB.
AWS Technologies
In this demonstration, we will use several AWS serverless services, including the following.
- AWS Lambda
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
- Amazon DynamoDB
- Amazon API Gateway
- Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)
Each Lambda will use function-specific execution roles, part of AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). We will log the event details and monitor services using Amazon CloudWatch.
To codify, build, package, deploy, and manage the Lambda functions and other AWS resources in a fully automated fashion, we will also use the following AWS services:
- AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM)
- AWS CloudFormation
- AWS Command Line Interface (CLI)
- AWS SDK for JavaScript in Node.js
- AWS SDK for Python (boto3)
Architecture
The high-level architecture for the platform provisioned and deployed in this post is illustrated in the diagram below. There are two separate workflows. In the first workflow (top), data is extracted from CSV files placed in S3, transformed, queued to SQS, and written to DynamoDB, using Python-based Lambda functions throughout. In the second workflow (bottom), data is manipulated in DynamoDB through interactions with a RESTful API, exposed via an API Gateway, and backed by Node.js-based Lambda functions.
Using the vast array of current AWS services, there are several ways we could extract, transform, and load data from static files into DynamoDB. The demonstration’s event-driven, serverless architecture represents just one possible approach.
Source Code
All source code for this post is available on GitHub in a single public repository, serverless-sqs-dynamo-demo. To clone the GitHub repository, execute the following command.
git clone --branch master --single-branch --depth 1 --no-tags \ https://github.com/garystafford/serverless-sqs-dynamo-demo.git
The project files relevant to this demonstration are organized as follows.
. ├── README.md ├── lambda_apigtw_to_dynamodb │ ├── app.js │ ├── events │ ├── node_modules │ ├── package.json │ └── tests ├── lambda_s3_to_sqs │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── app.py │ ├── requirements.txt │ └── tests ├── lambda_sqs_to_dynamodb │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── app.py │ ├── requirements.txt │ └── tests ├── requirements.txt ├── template.yaml └── sample_data ├── data.csv ├── data_bad_msg.csv └── data_good_msg.csv
Some source code samples in this post are GitHub Gists, which may not display correctly on all social media browsers, such as LinkedIn.
Prerequisites
The demonstration assumes you already have an AWS account. You will need the latest copy of the AWS CLI, SAM CLI, and Python 3 installed on your development machine.
Additionally, you will need two existing S3 buckets. One bucket will be used to store the packaged project files for deployment. The second bucket is where we will place CSV data files, which, in turn, will trigger events that invoke multiple Lambda functions.
Deploying the Project
Before diving into the code, we will deploy the project to AWS. Conveniently, the entire project’s resources are codified in an AWS SAM template. We are using the AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM). AWS SAM is a model used to define serverless applications on AWS. According to the official SAM GitHub project documentation, AWS SAM is based on AWS CloudFormation. A serverless application is defined in a CloudFormation template and deployed as a CloudFormation stack.
Template Parameter
CloudFormation will create and uniquely name the SQS queues and the DynamoDB table. However, to avoid circular references, a common issue when creating resources associated with S3 event notifications, it is easier to use a pre-existing bucket. To start, you will need to change the SAM template’s DataBucketName parameter’s default value to your own S3 bucket name. Again, this bucket is where we will eventually push the CSV data files. Alternately, override the default values using the sam build command, next.
Parameters:
DataBucketName:
Type: String
Description: S3 bucket where CSV files are processed
Default: your-data-bucket-name
SAM CLI Commands
With the DataBucketName parameter set, proceed to validate, build, package, and deploy the project using the SAM CLI and the commands below. In addition to the sam validate command, I also like to use the aws cloudformation validate-template command to validate templates and catch any potential, additional errors.
Note the S3_BUCKET_BUILD variable, below, refers to the name of the S3 bucket SAM will use package and deploy the project from, as opposed to the S3 bucket, which the CSV data files will be placed into (gist).
After validating the template, SAM will build and package each individual Lambda function and its associated dependencies. Below, we see each individual Lambda function being packaged with a copy of its dependencies.
Once packaged, SAM will deploy the project and create the AWS resources as a CloudFormation stack.
Once the stack creation is complete, use the CloudFormation management console to review the AWS resources created by SAM. There are approximately 14 resources defined in the SAM template, which result in 33 individual resources deployed as part of the CloudFormation stack.
Note the stack’s output values. You will need these values to interact with the deployed platform, later in the demonstration.
Test the Deployed Application
Once the CloudFormation stack has deployed without error, copying a CSV file to the S3 bucket is the quickest way to confirm everything is working. The project includes test data files with 20 rows of test message data. Below is a sample of the CSV file, which is included in the project. The data was collected from IoT devices that measured response time from wired versus wireless devices on a LAN network; the message details are immaterial to this demonstration (gist).
Run the following commands to copy the test data file to your S3 bucket.
S3_DATA_BUCKET=your_data_bucket_name aws s3 cp sample_data/data.csv s3://$S3_DATA_BUCKET
Visit the DynamoDB management console. You should observe a new DynamoDB table.
Within the new DynamoDB table, you should observe twenty items, corresponding to each of the twenty rows in the CSV file, uploaded to S3.
Drill into an individual item within the table and review its attributes. They should match the rows in the CSV file.
Both the Python- and Node.js-based Lambda functions have their default logging levels set to debug. The debug-level output from each Lambda function is streamed to individual Amazon CloudWatch Log Groups. We can use the CloudWatch logs to troubleshoot any issues with the deployed application. Below we see an example of CloudWatch log entries for the request and response payloads generated from GetMessageFunction Lambda function, which is querying DynamoDB for a single Item.
Event-Driven Patterns
There are three distinct and discrete event-driven dataflows within the demonstration’s architecture
- S3 Event Source for Lambda (S3 to SQS)
- SQS Event Source for Lambda (SQS to DynamoDB)
- API Gateway Event Source for Lambda (API Gateway to DynamoDB)
Let’s examine each event-driven dataflow and the Lambda code associated with that part of the architecture.
S3 Event Source for Lambda
Whenever a file is copied into the target S3 bucket, an S3 Event Notification triggers an asynchronous invocation of a Lambda. According to AWS, when you invoke a function asynchronously, the Lambda sends the event to the SQS queue. A separate process reads events from the queue and executes your Lambda function.
The Lambda’s function handler, written in Python, reads the CSV file, whose filename is contained in the event. The Lambda extracts the rows in the CSV file, transforms the data, and pushes each message to the SQS queue (gist).
Below is an example of a message body, part an SQS message, extracted from a single row of the CSV file, and sent by the Lambda to the SQS queue. The timestamp has been converted to separate date and time fields by the Lambda. The DynamoDB table is part of the SQS message body. The key/value pairs in the Item JSON object reflect the schema of the DynamoDB table (gist).
SQS Event Source for Lambda
According to AWS, SQS offers two types of message queues, Standard and FIFO (First-In-First-Out). An SQS FIFO queue is designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent. A Standard SQS queue offers maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery.
Examining the SQS management console, you should observe that the CloudFormation stack creates two SQS Standard queues—a primary queue and a Dead Letter Queue (DLQ). According to AWS, Amazon SQS supports dead-letter queues, which other queues (source queues) can target for messages that cannot be processed (consumed) successfully.
Examining the SQS Lambda Triggers tab, you should observe the Lambda, which will be triggered by the SQS events.
When a message is pushed into the SQS queue by the previous process, an SQS event is fired, which synchronously triggers an invocation of the Lambda using the SQS Event Source for Lambda functionality. When a function is invoked synchronously, Lambda runs the function and waits for a response.
In the demonstration, the Lambda’s function handler, also written in Python, pulls the message off of the SQS queue and writes the message (DynamoDB put) to the DynamoDB table. Although writing is the primary use case in this demonstration, an event could also trigger a get, scan, update, or delete command to be executed on the DynamoDB table (gist).
API Gateway Event Source for Lambda
Examining the API Gateway management console, you should observe that CloudFormation created a new Edge-optimized API. The API contains several resources and their associated HTTP methods.
Each API resource is associated with a deployed Lambda function. Switching to the Lambda console, you should observe a total of seven new Lambda functions. There are five Lambda functions related to the API, in addition to the Lambda called by the S3 event notifications and the Lambda called by the SQS event notifications.
Examining one of the Lambda functions associated with the API Gateway, we should observe that the API Gateway trigger for the Lambda (lower left and bottom).
When an end-user makes an HTTP(S) request via the RESTful API exposed by the API Gateway, an event is fired, which synchronously invokes a Lambda using the API Gateway Event Source for Lambda functionality. The event contains details about the HTTP request that is received. The event triggers any one of five different Lambda functions, depending on the HTTP request method.
The Lambda code, written in Node.js, contains five function handlers. Each handler corresponds to an HTTP method, including GET (DynamoDB get) POST (put), PUT (update), DELETE (delete), and SCAN (scan). Below is an example of the getMessage handler function. The function accepts two inputs. First, a path parameter, the date, which is the primary partition key for the DynamoDB table. Second, a query parameter, the time, which is the primary sort key for the DynamoDB table. Both the primary partition key and sort key must be passed to DynamoDB to retrieve the requested record (gist).
Test the API
To test the Lambda functions, called by our API, we can use the sam local invoke command, part of the SAM CLI. Using this command, we can test the local Lambda functions, without them being deployed to AWS. The command allows us to trigger events, which the Lambda functions will handle. This is useful as we continue to develop, test, and re-deploy the Lambda functions to our Development, Staging, and Production environments.
The local Node.js-based, API-related Lambda functions, just like their deployed copies, will execute commands against the actual DynamoDB on AWS. The Github project contains a set of five sample events, corresponding to the five Lambda functions, which in turn are associated with five different HTTP methods and API resources. For example, the event_getMessage.json event is associated with the GET HTTP method and calls the /message/{date}?time={time} resource endpoint, to return a single item. This event, shown below, triggers the GetMessageFunction Lambda (gist).
We can trigger all the events from using the CLI. The local Lambda expects the DynamoDB table name to exist as an environment variable. Make sure you set it locally, first, before executing the sam local invoke commands (gist).
If the events were successfully handled by the local Lambda functions, in the terminal, you should see the same HTTP response status codes you would expect from calling the RESTful resources via the API Gateway. Below, for example, we see the POST event being handled by the PostMessageFunction Lambda, adding a record to the DynamoDB table, and returning a successful status of 201 Created.
Testing the Deployed API
To test the actual deployed API, we can call one of the API’s resources using an HTTP client, such as Postman. To locate the URL used to invoke the API resource, look at the ‘Prod’ Stage for the new API. This can be found in the Stages tab of the API Gateway console. For example, note the Invoke URL for the POST HTTP method of the /message resource, shown below.
Below, we see an example of using Postman to make an HTTP GET request the /message/{date}?time={time} resource. We pass the required query and path parameters for date and for time. The request should receive a single item in response from DynamoDB, via the API Gateway and the associated Lambda. Here, the request was successful, and the Lambda function returns a 200 OK status.
Similarly, below, we see an example of calling the same /message endpoint using the HTTP POST method. In the body of the POST request, we pass the DynamoDB table name and the Item object. Again, the POST is successful, and the Lambda function returns a 201 Created status.
Cleaning Up
To complete the demonstration and remove the AWS resources, run the following commands. It is necessary to delete all objects from the S3 data bucket, first, before deleting the CloudFormation stack. Else, the stack deletion will fail.
S3_DATA_BUCKET=your_data_bucket_name STACK_NAME=your_stack_name aws s3 rm s3://$S3_DATA_BUCKET/data.csv # and any other objects aws cloudformation delete-stack \ --stack-name $STACK_NAME
Conclusion
In this post, we explored a simple example of building a modern application using an event-driven serverless architecture on AWS. We used several services, all part of the AWS Serverless Computing platform, including Lambda, API Gateway, SQS, S3, and DynamoDB. In addition to these, AWS has additional serverless services, which could enhance this demonstration, in particular, Amazon Kinesis, AWS Step Functions, Amazon SNS, and AWS AppSync.
In a future post, we will look at how to further test the individual components within this demonstration’s application stack, and how to automate its deployment using DevOps and CI/CD principals on AWS.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
Istio Observability with Go, gRPC, and Protocol Buffers-based Microservices
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in Bash Scripting, Build Automation, Client-Side Development, Cloud, Continuous Delivery, DevOps, Enterprise Software Development, GCP, Go, JavaScript, Kubernetes, Software Development on April 17, 2019
In the last two posts, Kubernetes-based Microservice Observability with Istio Service Mesh and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Observability with Istio Service Mesh, we explored the observability tools which are included with Istio Service Mesh. These tools currently include Prometheus and Grafana for metric collection, monitoring, and alerting, Jaeger for distributed tracing, and Kiali for Istio service-mesh-based microservice visualization and monitoring. Combined with cloud platform-native monitoring and logging services, such as Stackdriver on GCP, CloudWatch on AWS, Azure Monitor logs on Azure, and we have a complete observability solution for modern, distributed, Cloud-based applications.
In this post, we will examine the use of Istio’s observability tools to monitor Go-based microservices that use Protocol Buffers (aka Protobuf) over gRPC (gRPC Remote Procedure Calls) and HTTP/2 for client-server communications, as opposed to the more traditional, REST-based JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) over HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol). We will see how Kubernetes, Istio, Envoy, and the observability tools work seamlessly with gRPC, just as they do with JSON over HTTP, on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).
Technologies
gRPC
According to the gRPC project, gRPC, a CNCF incubating project, is a modern, high-performance, open-source and universal remote procedure call (RPC) framework that can run anywhere. It enables client and server applications to communicate transparently and makes it easier to build connected systems. Google, the original developer of gRPC, has used the underlying technologies and concepts in gRPC for years. The current implementation is used in several Google cloud products and Google externally facing APIs. It is also being used by Square, Netflix, CoreOS, Docker, CockroachDB, Cisco, Juniper Networks and many other organizations.
Protocol Buffers
By default, gRPC uses Protocol Buffers. According to Google, Protocol Buffers (aka Protobuf) are a language- and platform-neutral, efficient, extensible, automated mechanism for serializing structured data for use in communications protocols, data storage, and more. Protocol Buffers are 3 to 10 times smaller and 20 to 100 times faster than XML. Once you have defined your messages, you run the protocol buffer compiler for your application’s language on your .proto file to generate data access classes.
Protocol Buffers are 3 to 10 times smaller and 20 to 100 times faster than XML.
Protocol buffers currently support generated code in Java, Python, Objective-C, and C++, Dart, Go, Ruby, and C#. For this post, we have compiled for Go. You can read more about the binary wire format of Protobuf on Google’s Developers Portal.
Envoy Proxy
According to the Istio project, Istio uses an extended version of the Envoy proxy. Envoy is deployed as a sidecar to a relevant service in the same Kubernetes pod. Envoy, created by Lyft, is a high-performance proxy developed in C++ to mediate all inbound and outbound traffic for all services in the service mesh. Istio leverages Envoy’s many built-in features, including dynamic service discovery, load balancing, TLS termination, HTTP/2 and gRPC proxies, circuit-breakers, health checks, staged rollouts, fault injection, and rich metrics.
According to the post by Harvey Tuch of Google, Evolving a Protocol Buffer canonical API, Envoy proxy adopted Protocol Buffers, specifically proto3, as the canonical specification of for version 2 of Lyft’s gRPC-first API.
Reference Microservices Platform
In the last two posts, we explored Istio’s observability tools, using a RESTful microservices-based API platform written in Go and using JSON over HTTP for service to service communications. The API platform was comprised of eight Go-based microservices and one sample Angular 7, TypeScript-based front-end web client. The various services are dependent on MongoDB, and RabbitMQ for event queue-based communications. Below, the is JSON over HTTP-based platform architecture.
Below, the current Angular 7-based web client interface.
Converting to gRPC and Protocol Buffers
For this post, I have modified the eight Go microservices to use gRPC and Protocol Buffers, Google’s data interchange format. Specifically, the services use version 3 release (aka proto3) of Protocol Buffers. With gRPC, a gRPC client calls a gRPC server. Some of the platform’s services are gRPC servers, others are gRPC clients, while some act as both client and server, such as Service A, B, and E. The revised architecture is shown below.
gRPC Gateway
Assuming for the sake of this demonstration, that most consumers of the API would still expect to communicate using a RESTful JSON over HTTP API, I have added a gRPC Gateway reverse proxy to the platform. The gRPC Gateway is a gRPC to JSON reverse proxy, a common architectural pattern, which proxies communications between the JSON over HTTP-based clients and the gRPC-based microservices. A diagram from the grpc-gateway GitHub project site effectively demonstrates how the reverse proxy works.
Image courtesy: https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway
In the revised platform architecture diagram above, note the addition of the reverse proxy, which replaces Service A at the edge of the API. The proxy sits between the Angular-based Web UI and Service A. Also, note the communication method between services is now Protobuf over gRPC instead of JSON over HTTP. The use of Envoy Proxy (via Istio) is unchanged, as is the MongoDB Atlas-based databases and CloudAMQP RabbitMQ-based queue, which are still external to the Kubernetes cluster.
Alternatives to gRPC Gateway
As an alternative to the gRPC Gateway reverse proxy, we could convert the TypeScript-based Angular UI client to gRPC and Protocol Buffers, and continue to communicate directly with Service A as the edge service. However, this would limit other consumers of the API to rely on gRPC as opposed to JSON over HTTP, unless we also chose to expose two different endpoints, gRPC, and JSON over HTTP, another common pattern.
Demonstration
In this post’s demonstration, we will repeat the exact same installation process, outlined in the previous post, Kubernetes-based Microservice Observability with Istio Service Mesh. We will deploy the revised gRPC-based platform to GKE on GCP. You could just as easily follow Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Observability with Istio Service Mesh, and deploy the platform to AKS.
Source Code
All source code for this post is available on GitHub, contained in three projects. The Go-based microservices source code, all Kubernetes resources, and all deployment scripts are located in the k8s-istio-observe-backend project repository, in the new grpc branch.
git clone \ --branch grpc --single-branch --depth 1 --no-tags \ https://github.com/garystafford/k8s-istio-observe-backend.git
The Angular-based web client source code is located in the k8s-istio-observe-frontend repository on the new grpc branch. The source protocol buffers .proto file and the generated code, using the protocol buffers compiler, is located in the new pb-greeting project repository. You do not need to clone either of these projects for this post’s demonstration.
All Docker images for the services, UI, and the reverse proxy are located on Docker Hub.
Code Changes
This post is not specifically about writing Go for gRPC and Protobuf. However, to better understand the observability requirements and capabilities of these technologies, compared to JSON over HTTP, it is helpful to review some of the source code.
Service A
First, compare the source code for Service A, shown below, to the original code in the previous post. The service’s code is almost completely re-written. I relied on several references for writing the code, including, Tracing gRPC with Istio, written by Neeraj Poddar of Aspen Mesh and Distributed Tracing Infrastructure with Jaeger on Kubernetes, by Masroor Hasan.
Specifically, note the following code changes to Service A:
- Import of the pb-greeting protobuf package;
- Local Greeting struct replaced with
pb.Greetingstruct; - All services are now hosted on port
50051; - The HTTP server and all API resource handler functions are removed;
- Headers, used for distributed tracing with Jaeger, have moved from HTTP request object to metadata passed in the gRPC context object;
- Service A is coded as a gRPC server, which is called by the gRPC Gateway reverse proxy (gRPC client) via the
Greetingfunction; - The primary
PingHandlerfunction, which returns the service’s Greeting, is replaced by the pb-greeting protobuf package’sGreetingfunction; - Service A is coded as a gRPC client, calling both Service B and Service C using the
CallGrpcServicefunction; - CORS handling is offloaded to Istio;
- Logging methods are unchanged;
Source code for revised gRPC-based Service A (gist):
Greeting Protocol Buffers
Shown below is the greeting source protocol buffers .proto file. The greeting response struct, originally defined in the services, remains largely unchanged (gist). The UI client responses will look identical.
When compiled with protoc, the Go-based protocol compiler plugin, the original 27 lines of source code swells to almost 270 lines of generated data access classes that are easier to use programmatically.
# Generate gRPC stub (.pb.go)
protoc -I /usr/local/include -I. \
-I ${GOPATH}/src \
-I ${GOPATH}/src/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/third_party/googleapis \
--go_out=plugins=grpc:. \
greeting.proto
# Generate reverse-proxy (.pb.gw.go)
protoc -I /usr/local/include -I. \
-I ${GOPATH}/src \
-I ${GOPATH}/src/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/third_party/googleapis \
--grpc-gateway_out=logtostderr=true:. \
greeting.proto
# Generate swagger definitions (.swagger.json)
protoc -I /usr/local/include -I. \
-I ${GOPATH}/src \
-I ${GOPATH}/src/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/third_party/googleapis \
--swagger_out=logtostderr=true:. \
greeting.proto
Below is a small snippet of that compiled code, for reference. The compiled code is included in the pb-greeting project on GitHub and imported into each microservice and the reverse proxy (gist). We also compile a separate version for the reverse proxy to implement.
Using Swagger, we can view the greeting protocol buffers’ single RESTful API resource, exposed with an HTTP GET method. I use the Docker-based version of Swagger UI for viewing protoc generated swagger definitions.
docker run -p 8080:8080 -d --name swagger-ui \
-e SWAGGER_JSON=/tmp/greeting.swagger.json \
-v ${GOAPTH}/src/pb-greeting:/tmp swaggerapi/swagger-ui
The Angular UI makes an HTTP GET request to the /api/v1/greeting resource, which is transformed to gRPC and proxied to Service A, where it is handled by the Greeting function.
gRPC Gateway Reverse Proxy
As explained earlier, the gRPC Gateway reverse proxy service is completely new. Specifically, note the following code features in the gist below:
- Import of the pb-greeting protobuf package;
- The proxy is hosted on port
80; - Request headers, used for distributed tracing with Jaeger, are collected from the incoming HTTP request and passed to Service A in the gRPC context;
- The proxy is coded as a gRPC client, which calls Service A;
- Logging is largely unchanged;
The source code for the Reverse Proxy (gist):
Below, in the Stackdriver logs, we see an example of a set of HTTP request headers in the JSON payload, which are propagated upstream to gRPC-based Go services from the gRPC Gateway’s reverse proxy. Header propagation ensures the request produces a complete distributed trace across the complete service call chain.
Istio VirtualService and CORS
According to feedback in the project’s GitHub Issues, the gRPC Gateway does not directly support Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policy. In my own experience, the gRPC Gateway cannot handle OPTIONS HTTP method requests, which must be issued by the Angular 7 web UI. Therefore, I have offloaded CORS responsibility to Istio, using the VirtualService resource’s CorsPolicy configuration. This makes CORS much easier to manage than coding CORS configuration into service code (gist):
Set-up and Installation
To deploy the microservices platform to GKE, follow the detailed instructions in part one of the post, Kubernetes-based Microservice Observability with Istio Service Mesh: Part 1, or Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Observability with Istio Service Mesh for AKS.
- Create the external MongoDB Atlas database and CloudAMQP RabbitMQ clusters;
- Modify the Kubernetes resource files and bash scripts for your own environments;
- Create the managed GKE or AKS cluster on GCP or Azure;
- Configure and deploy Istio to the managed Kubernetes cluster, using Helm;
- Create DNS records for the platform’s exposed resources;
- Deploy the Go-based microservices, gRPC Gateway reverse proxy, Angular UI, and associated resources to Kubernetes cluster;
- Test and troubleshoot the platform deployment;
- Observe the results;
The Three Pillars
As introduced in the first post, logs, metrics, and traces are often known as the three pillars of observability. These are the external outputs of the system, which we may observe. As modern distributed systems grow ever more complex, the ability to observe those systems demands equally modern tooling that was designed with this level of complexity in mind. Traditional logging and monitoring systems often struggle with today’s hybrid and multi-cloud, polyglot language-based, event-driven, container-based and serverless, infinitely-scalable, ephemeral-compute platforms.
Tools like Istio Service Mesh attempt to solve the observability challenge by offering native integrations with several best-of-breed, open-source telemetry tools. Istio’s integrations include Jaeger for distributed tracing, Kiali for Istio service mesh-based microservice visualization and monitoring, and Prometheus and Grafana for metric collection, monitoring, and alerting. Combined with cloud platform-native monitoring and logging services, such as Stackdriver for GKE, CloudWatch for Amazon’s EKS, or Azure Monitor logs for AKS, and we have a complete observability solution for modern, distributed, Cloud-based applications.
Pillar 1: Logging
Moving from JSON over HTTP to gRPC does not require any changes to the logging configuration of the Go-based service code or Kubernetes resources.
Stackdriver with Logrus
As detailed in part two of the last post, Kubernetes-based Microservice Observability with Istio Service Mesh, our logging strategy for the eight Go-based microservices and the reverse proxy continues to be the use of Logrus, the popular structured logger for Go, and Banzai Cloud’s logrus-runtime-formatter.
If you recall, the Banzai formatter automatically tags log messages with runtime/stack information, including function name and line number; extremely helpful when troubleshooting. We are also using Logrus’ JSON formatter. Below, in the Stackdriver console, note how each log entry below has the JSON payload contained within the message with the log level, function name, lines on which the log entry originated, and the message.
Below, we see the details of a specific log entry’s JSON payload. In this case, we can see the request headers propagated from the downstream service.
Pillar 2: Metrics
Moving from JSON over HTTP to gRPC does not require any changes to the metrics configuration of the Go-based service code or Kubernetes resources.
Prometheus
Prometheus is a completely open source and community-driven systems monitoring and alerting toolkit originally built at SoundCloud, circa 2012. Interestingly, Prometheus joined the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) in 2016 as the second hosted-project, after Kubernetes.
Grafana
Grafana describes itself as the leading open source software for time series analytics. According to Grafana Labs, Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on, and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. You can easily create, explore, and share visually-rich, data-driven dashboards. Grafana allows users to visually define alert rules for your most important metrics. Grafana will continuously evaluate rules and can send notifications.
According to Istio, the Grafana add-on is a pre-configured instance of Grafana. The Grafana Docker base image has been modified to start with both a Prometheus data source and the Istio Dashboard installed. Below, we see two of the pre-configured dashboards, the Istio Mesh Dashboard and the Istio Performance Dashboard.
Pillar 3: Traces
Moving from JSON over HTTP to gRPC did require a complete re-write of the tracing logic in the service code. In fact, I spent the majority of my time ensuring the correct headers were propagated from the Istio Ingress Gateway to the gRPC Gateway reverse proxy, to Service A in the gRPC context, and upstream to all the dependent, gRPC-based services. I am sure there are a number of optimization in my current code, regarding the correct handling of traces and how this information is propagated across the service call stack.
Jaeger
According to their website, Jaeger, inspired by Dapper and OpenZipkin, is a distributed tracing system released as open source by Uber Technologies. It is used for monitoring and troubleshooting microservices-based distributed systems, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis, and performance and latency optimization. The Jaeger website contains an excellent overview of Jaeger’s architecture and general tracing-related terminology.
Below we see the Jaeger UI Traces View. In it, we see a series of traces generated by hey, a modern load generator and benchmarking tool, and a worthy replacement for Apache Bench (ab). Unlike ab, hey supports HTTP/2. The use of hey was detailed in the previous post.
A trace, as you might recall, is an execution path through the system and can be thought of as a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of spans. If you have worked with systems like Apache Spark, you are probably already familiar with DAGs.
Below we see the Jaeger UI Trace Detail View. The example trace contains 16 spans, which encompasses nine components – seven of the eight Go-based services, the reverse proxy, and the Istio Ingress Gateway. The trace and the spans each have timings. The root span in the trace is the Istio Ingress Gateway. In this demo, traces do not span the RabbitMQ message queues. This means you would not see a trace which includes the decoupled, message-based communications between Service D to Service F, via the RabbitMQ.
Within the Jaeger UI Trace Detail View, you also have the ability to drill into a single span, which contains additional metadata. Metadata includes the URL being called, HTTP method, response status, and several other headers.
Microservice Observability
Moving from JSON over HTTP to gRPC does not require any changes to the Kiali configuration of the Go-based service code or Kubernetes resources.
Kiali
According to their website, Kiali provides answers to the questions: What are the microservices in my Istio service mesh, and how are they connected? Kiali works with Istio, in OpenShift or Kubernetes, to visualize the service mesh topology, to provide visibility into features like circuit breakers, request rates and more. It offers insights about the mesh components at different levels, from abstract Applications to Services and Workloads.
The Graph View in the Kiali UI is a visual representation of the components running in the Istio service mesh. Below, filtering on the cluster’s dev Namespace, we should observe that Kiali has mapped all components in the platform, along with rich metadata, such as their version and communication protocols.
Using Kiali, we can confirm our service-to-service IPC protocol is now gRPC instead of the previous HTTP.
Conclusion
Although converting from JSON over HTTP to protocol buffers with gRPC required major code changes to the services, it did not impact the high-level observability we have of those services using the tools provided by Istio, including Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, and Kiali.
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Observability with Istio Service Mesh
Posted by Gary A. Stafford in Azure, Bash Scripting, Cloud, DevOps, Go, JavaScript, Kubernetes, Software Development on March 31, 2019
In the last two-part post, Kubernetes-based Microservice Observability with Istio Service Mesh, we deployed Istio, along with its observability tools, Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, and Kiali, to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). Following that post, I received several questions about using Istio’s observability tools with other popular managed Kubernetes platforms, primarily Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). In most cases, including with AKS, both Istio and the observability tools are compatible.
In this short follow-up of the last post, we will replace the GKE-specific cluster setup commands, found in part one of the last post, with new commands to provision a similar AKS cluster on Azure. The new AKS cluster will run Istio 1.1.3, released 4/15/2019, alongside the latest available version of AKS (Kubernetes), 1.12.6. We will replace Google’s Stackdriver logging with Azure Monitor logs. We will retain the external MongoDB Atlas cluster and the external CloudAMQP cluster dependencies.
Previous articles about AKS include First Impressions of AKS, Azure’s New Managed Kubernetes Container Service (November 2017) and Architecting Cloud-Optimized Apps with AKS (Azure’s Managed Kubernetes), Azure Service Bus, and Cosmos DB (December 2017).
Source Code
All source code for this post is available on GitHub in two projects. The Go-based microservices source code, all Kubernetes resources, and all deployment scripts are located in the k8s-istio-observe-backend project repository.
git clone \ --branch master --single-branch \ --depth 1 --no-tags \ https://github.com/garystafford/k8s-istio-observe-backend.git
The Angular UI TypeScript-based source code is located in the k8s-istio-observe-frontend repository. You will not need to clone the Angular UI project for this post’s demonstration.
Setup
This post assumes you have a Microsoft Azure account with the necessary resource providers registered, and the Azure Command-Line Interface (CLI), az, installed and available to your command shell. You will also need Helm and Istio 1.1.3 installed and configured, which is covered in the last post.
Start by logging into Azure from your command shell.
az login \
--username {{ your_username_here }} \
--password {{ your_password_here }}
Resource Providers
If you are new to Azure or AKS, you may need to register some additional resource providers to complete this demonstration.
az provider list --output table
If you are missing required resource providers, you will see errors similar to the one shown below. Simply activate the particular provider corresponding to the error.
Operation failed with status:'Bad Request'. Details: Required resource provider registrations Microsoft.Compute, Microsoft.Network are missing.
To register the necessary providers, use the Azure CLI or the Azure Portal UI.
az provider register --namespace Microsoft.ContainerService az provider register --namespace Microsoft.Network az provider register --namespace Microsoft.Compute
Resource Group
AKS requires an Azure Resource Group. According to Azure, a resource group is a container that holds related resources for an Azure solution. The resource group includes those resources that you want to manage as a group. I chose to create a new resource group associated with my closest geographic Azure Region, East US, using the Azure CLI.
az group create \ --resource-group aks-observability-demo \ --location eastus
Create the AKS Cluster
Before creating the GKE cluster, check for the latest versions of AKS. At the time of this post, the latest versions of AKS was 1.12.6.
az aks get-versions \ --location eastus \ --output table
Using the latest GKE version, create the GKE managed cluster. There are many configuration options available with the az aks create command. For this post, I am creating three worker nodes using the Azure Standard_DS3_v2 VM type, which will give us a total of 12 vCPUs and 42 GB of memory. Anything smaller and all the Pods may not be schedulable. Instead of supplying an existing SSH key, I will let Azure create a new one. You should have no need to SSH into the worker nodes. I am also enabling the monitoring add-on. According to Azure, the add-on sets up Azure Monitor for containers, announced in December 2018, which monitors the performance of workloads deployed to Kubernetes environments hosted on AKS.
time az aks create \ --name aks-observability-demo \ --resource-group aks-observability-demo \ --node-count 3 \ --node-vm-size Standard_DS3_v2 \ --enable-addons monitoring \ --generate-ssh-keys \ --kubernetes-version 1.12.6
Using the time command, we observe that the cluster took approximately 5m48s to provision; I have seen times up to almost 10 minutes. AKS provisioning is not as fast as GKE, which in my experience is at least 2x-3x faster than AKS for a similarly sized cluster.
After the cluster creation completes, retrieve your AKS cluster credentials.
az aks get-credentials \ --name aks-observability-demo \ --resource-group aks-observability-demo \ --overwrite-existing
Examine the Cluster
Use the following command to confirm the cluster is ready by examining the status of three worker nodes.
kubectl get nodes --output=wide
Observe that Azure currently uses Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS for the worker node’s host operating system. If you recall, GKE offers both Ubuntu as well as a Container-Optimized OS from Google.
Kubernetes Dashboard
Unlike GKE, there is no custom AKS dashboard. Therefore, we will use the Kubernetes Web UI (dashboard), which is installed by default with AKS, unlike GKE. According to Azure, to make full use of the dashboard, since the AKS cluster uses RBAC, a ClusterRoleBinding must be created before you can correctly access the dashboard.
kubectl create clusterrolebinding kubernetes-dashboard \ --clusterrole=cluster-admin \ --serviceaccount=kube-system:kubernetes-dashboard
Next, we must create a proxy tunnel on local port 8001 to the dashboard running on the AKS cluster. This CLI command creates a proxy between your local system and the Kubernetes API and opens your web browser to the Kubernetes dashboard.
az aks browse \ --name aks-observability-demo \ --resource-group aks-observability-demo
Although you should use the Azure CLI, PowerShell, or SDK for all your AKS configuration tasks, using the dashboard for monitoring the cluster and the resources running on it, is invaluable.
The Kubernetes dashboard also provides access to raw container logs. Azure Monitor provides the ability to construct complex log queries, but for quick troubleshooting, you may just want to see the raw logs a specific container is outputting, from the dashboard.
Azure Portal
Logging into the Azure Portal, we can observe the AKS cluster, within the new Resource Group.
In addition to the Azure Resource Group we created, there will be a second Resource Group created automatically during the creation of the AKS cluster. This group contains all the resources that compose the AKS cluster. These resources include the three worker node VM instances, and their corresponding storage disks and NICs. The group also includes a network security group, route table, virtual network, and an availability set.
Deploy Istio
From this point on, the process to deploy Istio Service Mesh and the Go-based microservices platform follows the previous post and use the exact same scripts. After modifying the Kubernetes resource files, to deploy Istio, use the bash script, part4_install_istio.sh. I have added a few more pauses in the script to account for the apparently slower response times from AKS as opposed to GKE. It definitely takes longer to spin up the Istio resources on AKS than on GKE, which can result in errors if you do not pause between each stage of the deployment process.
Using the Kubernetes dashboard, we can view the Istio resources running in the istio-system Namespace, as shown below. Confirm that all resource Pods are running and healthy before deploying the Go-based microservices platform.
Deploy the Platform
Deploy the Go-based microservices platform, using bash deploy script, part5a_deploy_resources.sh.
The script deploys two replicas (Pods) of each of the eight microservices, Service-A through Service-H, and the Angular UI, to the dev and test Namespaces, for a total of 36 Pods. Each Pod will have the Istio sidecar proxy (Envoy Proxy) injected into it, alongside the microservice or UI.
Azure Load Balancer
If we return to the Resource Group created automatically when the AKS cluster was created, we will now see two additional resources. There is now an Azure Load Balancer and Public IP Address.
Similar to the GKE cluster in the last post, when the Istio Ingress Gateway is deployed as part of the platform, it is materialized as an Azure Load Balancer. The front-end of the load balancer is the new public IP address. The back-end of the load-balancer is a pool containing the three AKS worker node VMs. The load balancer is associated with a set of rules and health probes.
DNS
I have associated the new Azure public IP address, connected with the front-end of the load balancer, with the four subdomains I am using to represent the UI and the edge service, Service-A, in both Namespaces. If Azure is your primary Cloud provider, then Azure DNS is a good choice to manage your domain’s DNS records. For this demo, you will require your own domain.
Testing the Platform
With everything deployed, test the platform is responding and generate HTTP traffic for the observability tools to record. Similar to last time, I have chosen hey, a modern load generator and benchmarking tool, and a worthy replacement for Apache Bench (ab). Unlike ab, hey supports HTTP/2. Below, I am running hey directly from Azure Cloud Shell. The tool is simulating 10 concurrent users, generating a total of 500 HTTP GET requests to Service A.
# quick setup from Azure Shell using Bash go get -u github.com/rakyll/hey cd go/src/github.com/rakyll/hey/ go build ./hey -n 500 -c 10 -h2 http://api.dev.example-api.com/api/ping
We had 100% success with all 500 calls resulting in an HTTP 200 OK success status response code. Based on the results, we can observe the platform was capable of approximately 4 requests/second, with an average response time of 2.48 seconds and a mean time of 2.80 seconds. Almost all of that time was the result of waiting for the response, as the details indicate.
Logging
In this post, we have replaced GCP’s Stackdriver logging with Azure Monitor logs. According to Microsoft, Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from Cloud and on-premises environments. In my opinion, Stackdriver is a superior solution for searching and correlating the logs of distributed applications running on Kubernetes. I find the interface and query language of Stackdriver easier and more intuitive than Azure Monitor, which although powerful, requires substantial query knowledge to obtain meaningful results. For example, here is a query to view the log entries from the services in the dev Namespace, within the last day.
let startTimestamp = ago(1d);
KubePodInventory
| where TimeGenerated > startTimestamp
| where ClusterName =~ "aks-observability-demo"
| where Namespace == "dev"
| where Name contains "service-"
| distinct ContainerID
| join
(
ContainerLog
| where TimeGenerated > startTimestamp
)
on ContainerID
| project LogEntrySource, LogEntry, TimeGenerated, Name
| order by TimeGenerated desc
| render table
Below, we see the Logs interface with the search query and log entry results.
Below, we see a detailed view of a single log entry from Service A.
Observability Tools
The previous post goes into greater detail on the features of each of the observability tools provided by Istio, including Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, and Kiali.
We can use the exact same kubectl port-forward commands to connect to the tools on AKS as we did on GKE. According to Google, Kubernetes port forwarding allows using a resource name, such as a service name, to select a matching pod to port forward to since Kubernetes v1.10. We forward a local port to a port on the tool’s pod.
# Grafana
kubectl port-forward -n istio-system \
$(kubectl get pod -n istio-system -l app=grafana \
-o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 3000:3000 &
# Prometheus
kubectl -n istio-system port-forward \
$(kubectl -n istio-system get pod -l app=prometheus \
-o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 9090:9090 &
# Jaeger
kubectl port-forward -n istio-system \
$(kubectl get pod -n istio-system -l app=jaeger \
-o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 16686:16686 &
# Kiali
kubectl -n istio-system port-forward \
$(kubectl -n istio-system get pod -l app=kiali \
-o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 20001:20001 &
Prometheus and Grafana
Prometheus is a completely open source and community-driven systems monitoring and alerting toolkit originally built at SoundCloud, circa 2012. Interestingly, Prometheus joined the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) in 2016 as the second hosted-project, after Kubernetes.
Grafana describes itself as the leading open source software for time series analytics. According to Grafana Labs, Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on, and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. You can easily create, explore, and share visually-rich, data-driven dashboards. Grafana also users to visually define alert rules for your most important metrics. Grafana will continuously evaluate rules and can send notifications.
According to Istio, the Grafana add-on is a pre-configured instance of Grafana. The Grafana Docker base image has been modified to start with both a Prometheus data source and the Istio Dashboard installed. Below, we see one of the pre-configured dashboards, the Istio Service Dashboard.
Jaeger
According to their website, Jaeger, inspired by Dapper and OpenZipkin, is a distributed tracing system released as open source by Uber Technologies. It is used for monitoring and troubleshooting microservices-based distributed systems, including distributed context propagation, distributed transaction monitoring, root cause analysis, service dependency analysis, and performance and latency optimization. The Jaeger website contains a good overview of Jaeger’s architecture and general tracing-related terminology.
Below, we see a typical, distributed trace of the services, starting ingress gateway and passing across the upstream service dependencies.
Kaili
According to their website, Kiali provides answers to the questions: What are the microservices in my Istio service mesh, and how are they connected? Kiali works with Istio, in OpenShift or Kubernetes, to visualize the service mesh topology, to provide visibility into features like circuit breakers, request rates and more. It offers insights about the mesh components at different levels, from abstract Applications to Services and Workloads.
There is a common Kubernetes Secret that controls access to the Kiali API and UI. The default login is admin, the password is 1f2d1e2e67df.
Below, we see a detailed view of our platform, running in the dev namespace, on AKS.
Delete AKS Cluster
Once you are finished with this demo, use the following two commands to tear down the AKS cluster and remove the cluster context from your local configuration.
time az aks delete \ --name aks-observability-demo \ --resource-group aks-observability-demo \ --yes kubectl config delete-context aks-observability-demo
Conclusion
In this brief, follow-up post, we have explored how the current set of observability tools, part of the latest version of Istio Service Mesh, integrates with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).
All opinions expressed in this post are my own and not necessarily the views of my current or past employers or their clients.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for the Bash Scripting category.
Gary Stafford
AWS Solutions Architect | AWS Certified Professional | DevOps | Azure | GCP | Containers | Serverless | Spring | Node.js
